(Personal opinion)
On Mon, 5 Oct 2009, Margaret Wasserman wrote:
While I do think that the IAOC should be aware of the potential legal
implications of where we hold our meetings, I wonder if we are
treating China unfairly in this discussion...
I agree. So-far, we have always assumed
Hi all.
Just a few minor comments:
- The I-D refers to the EXP field several times (pages 11, 13, 15,
17...) whereas it is now named Traffic Class, as per RFC 5462.
- Section 5.8 tackles PCE, thus putting some requirements on the PCE WG:
do we expect that they are endorsed tacitly? In this
The IESG has received a request from the Handover Keying WG (hokey) to
consider the following document:
- 'Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP) Early Authentication Problem
Statement '
draft-ietf-hokey-preauth-ps-09.txt as an Informational RFC
The IESG plans to make a decision in the
As announced at the Stockholm IETF's BEHAVE meeting, BEHAVE will be using
WebEx and PSTN conferencing for the following interim meeting
to discuss 6/4 translation and advance those documents:
Wednesday, October 21, 7am-9am Pacific Time
Per http://www.ietf.org/meeting/cutoff-dates.html#76, the
76th IETF Meeting
Hiroshima, Japan
November 8-13, 2009
Host: WIDE
Only 31 days until the Hiroshima IETF!
The DRAFT Agenda is now available at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/76/agenda.html
A more final agenda will be available Friday, 16 October.
The IETF agenda is subject to change, up
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
RFC 5522
Title: Network Mobility Route Optimization Requirements
for Operational Use in Aeronautics and
Space Exploration Mobile Networks
Author:
