AFAICT, there is a registry for this already, just that its not easy to
find. SEND options are also ICMP options, so the registry is on the ICMP
options page: http://www.iana.org/assignments/icmpv6-parameters (Search
for 3971 or for Name Type.)
Jari
If you go through all of the trouble to say all of this:
On 18 mei 2010, at 21:46, Ray Pelletier wrote:
The IAOC has adopted a Meeting Room Policy regarding the use
of available IETF meeting room space, the approval process, and charges for
the
rooms and services based upon the category
Ray,
Thanks for this. I think the policy is a necessary one, and both the
policy and the ability to book space is useful for the IETF community at
large.
I did have a few issues with the details, however. Inline:
Group Categories
A. Working Groups, BOFs and Community Work Groups
1.
On 17 mei 2010, at 22:05, victor nunes wrote:
For example, if I wanted to write a book about an article or book on some
proprietary protocols, I'd have to ask permission for the patent holders of
their protocols?
You don't need to ask for permission to write a book if the country you're
On May 19, 2010, at 8:06 AM, Jari Arkko wrote:
Ray,
Thanks for this. I think the policy is a necessary one, and both the
policy and the ability to book space is useful for the IETF
community at large.
I did have a few issues with the details, however. Inline:
Group Categories
A.
On 5/18/10 12:32 PM, Marc Blanchet wrote:
Le 10-05-18 14:27, Sam Hartman a écrit :
Marc == Marc Blanchetmarc.blanc...@viagenie.ca writes:
Marc we had a discussion about the same subject: i.e. should we
Marc restrict the scope to a specific set of documents to
Marc
Hi Jari,
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Jari Arkko jari.ar...@piuha.net wrote:
AFAICT, there is a registry for this already, just that its not easy to
find. SEND options are also ICMP options, so the registry is on the ICMP
options page: http://www.iana.org/assignments/icmpv6-parameters
Marshall,
I think you are misreading this. This does not mean that you can't
request space earlier, or even that you can't be confirmed earlier,
just that after T - 2 weeks it goes to purely first come first service.
Ok. You are certainly right about what the text actually says. I'll
point
we had a discussion about the same subject: i.e. should we restrict the
scope to a specific set of documents to review/update/... or do we keep
some provision for other documents coming in the stream that require
help of the newprep. I was arguing for the latter. To me, what you are
talking
Le 10-05-19 09:40, Peter Saint-Andre a écrit :
On 5/18/10 12:32 PM, Marc Blanchet wrote:
Le 10-05-18 14:27, Sam Hartman a écrit :
Marc == Marc Blanchetmarc.blanc...@viagenie.ca writes:
Marc we had a discussion about the same subject: i.e. should we
Marc restrict the scope
On May 19, 2010, at 6:40 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
We're trying to balance two things here: (1) we want to get as much
input as possible from current and potential customers of stringprep or
newprep/stringprepbis/whatever, but (2) we want to scope the WG tightly
enough that it doesn't
Hi Mark,
Mark Lentczner wrote:
On May 19, 2010, at 6:40 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
[...]
In an email exchange with Marc and Alexey Melnikov last week, I proposed
adding ...
Although the group will seek input from and may provide advice to
customers working on other technologies, it
I believe that without explicitly listing the use cases I've brought up
in the body of the charter, the additional paragraph would be a
significant step backward. I would object to chartering the group with
that paragraph added without explicitly listing any use cases including
the onse I brought
Dear Behcet,
Can you please check the confirmation you received when you made your
reservation. There were a number of rates available with different terms, when
I contacted the MECC booking service and they indicated you booked the rate
which is non-refundable. This means you received a
78th IETF Meeting
Maastricht, Netherlands
July 25-30, 2010
The guest room blocks will be released on May 22, 2010, after that time,
the IETF group rate may not be available. For information on hotels,
please go to: http://www.ietf.org/meeting/78/hotel.html
Register online at:
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
RFC 5869
Title: HMAC-based Extract-and-Expand Key Derivation Function
(HKDF)
Author: H. Krawczyk, P. Eronen
Status: Informational
Stream:
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
RFC 5874
Title: An Extensible Markup Language (XML)
Document Format for Indicating a Change
in XML Configuration Access Protocol (XCAP)
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
RFC 5875
Title: An Extensible Markup Language (XML)
Configuration Access Protocol (XCAP) Diff Event
Package
Author: J. Urpalainen, D. Willis,
18 matches
Mail list logo
