Martin,
What about the IPv6 capabilities and configurability of devices that
are much more difficult to configure or update and much more expensive
to replace?
- Game consoles used for online gaming (XBox,PSP,WII)?
- Internet-capable Flatscreen-TVs
- Set-Top boxes (e.g. feature-enhanced DVB-
On 2010-05-30 18:49, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
So we need to extend the UPNP protocol so that when the local NAT box
receives a request to open up an external port, it relays the request
to the carrier NAT.
That's like msdp multicast state, who is going to allow you to
instantiate it in thei
On 2010-06-02 20:11, Doug Barton wrote:
On 06/02/10 10:50, Bob Hinden wrote:
The IAOC's intent in creating these "proposed IAOC administrative
procedures" was to write down what we were doing in areas where we
thought BCP101 wasn't clear to us or didn't specify anything, and
then get feed back f
Bob, is this a *new* Administrative Procedures document (for the IAOC), or a
proposed revision to an existing document that was produced some number of
years ago? If the former, then perhaps the message that launched this
thread should have said something like "the IAOC is considering an update to
On 06/02/10 10:50, Bob Hinden wrote:
The IAOC's intent in creating these "proposed IAOC administrative
procedures" was to write down what we were doing in areas where we
thought BCP101 wasn't clear to us or didn't specify anything, and
then get feed back from the community. We were not trying t
On 2010-06-02 16:40, Mark Andrews wrote:
It has both dhcpv6 client and server. it makes the assumuption that if
you want to assign v6 nameservers that you'll do so with stateful dhcpv6.
the product is closing in on a year old so I imagine the product
managers fixed the feature set in stone rathe
In message <4c06e306.3050...@bogus.com>, joel jaeggli writes:
> On 2010-06-02 15:44, Mark Andrews wrote:
> >> now would people please stop on this subject, the manufacturers know how
> >> to build this stuff.
> >
> > The only reference to IPv6 is "IPv6 Gold"
> >
> > Does that mean that it does PD?
On 2010-06-02 16:09, Martin Rex wrote:
What about the IPv6 capabilities and configurability of devices that
are much more difficult to configure or update and much more expensive
to replace?
- Game consoles used for online gaming (XBox,PSP,WII)?
- Internet-capable Flatscreen-TVs
- Set-Top
ned+i...@mauve.mrochek.com wrote:
>
> As I've stated previously, I believe the main piece that's missing is a
> SOHO-grade router that has full IPv6 support, 6to4 support, full
> IPv4/NAT/firewall support, plus a readonably intuitive GUI to administer it
> all. If such a product exists I continue
On 2010-06-02 15:44, Mark Andrews wrote:
now would people please stop on this subject, the manufacturers know how
to build this stuff.
The only reference to IPv6 is "IPv6 Gold"
Does that mean that it does PD?
It does not.
I don't know and I'm not about
to wade through the 135 page test spe
In message <4c06a72c.20...@bogus.com>, joel jaeggli writes:
> On 2010-06-02 07:36, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 1:19 PM, Ned Freed wrote:
> >
> >> As I've stated previously, I believe the main piece that's missing is a
> >> SOHO-grade router that has full IPv6 support, 6
On May 30, 2010, at 3:52 PM, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
> 1) Branding
>
> Every technology company that has wanted to establish an
> infrastructure to support their product has used branding as leverage.
> Remember 'Novell Ready', 'Entrust Ready', 'Windows Vista Ready'?
>
> We need an Internet
On 2010-06-02 07:36, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 1:19 PM, Ned Freed wrote:
As I've stated previously, I believe the main piece that's missing is a
SOHO-grade router that has full IPv6 support, 6to4 support, full
IPv4/NAT/firewall support, plus a readonably intuitive GUI
On 6/2/2010 10:50 AM, Bob Hinden wrote:
The IAOC's intent in creating these "proposed IAOC administrative procedures"
was to write down what we were doing in areas where we thought BCP101 wasn't
clear to us or didn't specify anything, and then get feed back from the
community. We were not try
John,
The IAOC's intent in creating these "proposed IAOC administrative procedures"
was to write down what we were doing in areas where we thought BCP101 wasn't
clear to us or didn't specify anything, and then get feed back from the
community. We were not trying to revise or alter BCP101. We
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 1:19 PM, Ned Freed wrote:
> As I've stated previously, I believe the main piece that's missing is a
> SOHO-grade router that has full IPv6 support, 6to4 support, full
> IPv4/NAT/firewall support, plus a readonably intuitive GUI to administer it
> all. If such a product exis
Hi,
FYI, a first report with test results for 34 devices is available
athttp://fit.nokia.com/lars/tmp/2010-hgw-study.pdf. Slides that summarize the
results are at http://fit.nokia.com/lars/tmp/2010-hgw-study-slides.pdf.
We have received another 30-odd devices as donations, which we'll add to th
On 6/2/10 12:39 AM, Yoav Nir wrote:
Nice to hear "just worked" in the context of IPv6. Did your router give you
just an IPv6 address, or also an IPv4 address? If both, does the IPv6 address ever get
anywhere on the Internet, or is it always NATted?
The router appears to use RFC3056, with t
Nice to hear "just worked" in the context of IPv6. Did your router give you
just an IPv6 address, or also an IPv4 address? If both, does the IPv6 address
ever get anywhere on the Internet, or is it always NATted?
-Original Message-
From: ietf-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-boun...@ietf.o
19 matches
Mail list logo
