- Original Message -
From: Marshall Eubanks t...@americafree.tv
To: m...@sap.com
Cc: ietf@ietf.org; NomCom Chair nomcom-ch...@ietf.org
Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 2:47 AM
On Sep 16, 2010, at 8:12 PM, Martin Rex wrote:
NomCom Chair wrote:
Nominations have slowed down
On 16/Sep/10 01:57, John C Klensin wrote:
[...] I think it is safe to conclude that the rough consensus in
the email is that the mechanism is really not workable regardless
of whether it can be implemented and whether the Italian government
says that it is required and works.
Well, it is
Hi John/SM,
As I am partially responsible for the final RFC Editor note that was
inserted before the document got approved, I feel obligated to comment
on this.
John C Klensin wrote:
--On Wednesday, September 15, 2010 13:59 -0700 SM
s...@resistor.net wrote:
Hello,
At 09:37 08-08-10,
Hi SM,
SM wrote:
[...]
Although there was strong concerns about this draft during the
Last-Call, the IESG has approved publication. Quoting some comments
made recently by an Area Director:
I don't think that it specifies well requirements it is trying to
fulfil and it doesn't use email
I would strongly object to a change to our process that removed the requirement
to demonstrate interoperability.
If we need additional incentives to advancement, perhaps we should require that
proposed standards revert to informational or historic if no action is taken
within three years.
--On Friday, September 17, 2010 10:44 +0200 Alessandro Vesely
ves...@tana.it wrote:
On 16/Sep/10 01:57, John C Klensin wrote:
[...] I think it is safe to conclude that the rough consensus
in the email is that the mechanism is really not workable
regardless of whether it can be implemented
Hi Alexey,
At 03:32 17-09-10, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
There might be some mis-communication on this and lack of anything
in the datatracker, but feedback was heard by the IESG.
According to the write-up, the issued identified by the community
were determined to be out of scope.
Firstly,
Hi Ted,
At 16:25 16-09-10, Ted Hardie wrote:
The attached draft is part of the discussion Russ started up
with draft-housley-two-maturity-levels. It is compatible with,
but does not require a reduction in maturity levels. If you
The -00 draft passes ID-nits. There is a mistake in the XML
Thanks for the comments, some replies inline.
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 1:39 PM, SM s...@resistor.net wrote:
Hi Ted,
At 16:25 16-09-10, Ted Hardie wrote:
The attached draft is part of the discussion Russ started up
with draft-housley-two-maturity-levels. It is compatible with,
but does not
We have created a meetings wiki for the attendees of IETF meetings
(Your Wiki) to exchange information about such matters as meeting
venues, activities, specialty restaurants, transportation, currency,
and local customs. There will be a wiki template provided for each
meeting. The wiki
The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'SDP and RTSP extensions defined for 3GPP Packet-switched Streaming
Service and Multimedia Broadcast/Multicast Service'
draft-westerlund-mmusic-3gpp-sdp-rtsp-08.txt as an Informational RFC
This document has been reviewed in the IETF but is not
The Mobility for IP: Performance, Signaling and Handoff Optimization
(mipshop) in the Internet Area has concluded. The IESG contact person is
Jari Arkko.
The mailing list will remain active.
This working group has completed most of the work in its charter, and
the two remaining active drafts
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
RFC 5998
Title: An Extension for EAP-Only Authentication
in IKEv2
Author: P. Eronen, H. Tschofenig,
Y. Sheffer
Status: Standards
13 matches
Mail list logo
