It is quite possible and rather likely that the PSTN will disappear but the
numbering system will not.
Telephone numbers have a major advantage of being able to be dialed from a
12 button keypad without kludges. China and other countries that
have syllabaries rather than alphabets are likely to
Because. Its not declining or disappearing .. just ask the mobile operators
who have added several billion new mobile handsets over the past few years.
Analog POTS is certainly dying but the E.164 namespace is doing even better
than domain names.
-Original Message-
From:
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 9:55 PM, Mark Andrews ma...@isc.org wrote:
The DNS is not just name to address translation.
It doesn't really matter what DNS translates, all translations
are equally untrusted.
The architecture of the internet is based on good faith and best effort.
DNS is _no_
Hi folks,
What you're saying is that you are not the target customer for this stuff.
I would guess that few people on this list are either.
That does not however mean that a few billion users around the world mostly
use smartphones or PCs; either that or I have missed the heaps of 12 digit
phones
Lawrence Conroy wrote:
Everyone MOSTLY calls from a small contact list, and the same holds for the
group of people who call them. The goal is to support them when they don't.
I don't know how long a phone number in Marrakech should be. Rather than
place an International call to find out I've
Richard Shockey wrote:
Because. Its not declining or disappearing .. just ask the mobile operators
FYI, KDDI, the second largest mobile operator in Japan, has just
announced to support skype as a formal application.
It's inevitable as data traffic is exceeding voice traffic.
It is true that
My point was that folk who are looking at this mechanism as an optimization
within the existing boxes should also look at the fact that the box
boundaries are wrong and inefficient.
The use experience should be unaffected by this issue. A telephone call has
ten or so numbers and a DNS round trip
We are making a few changes to ensure that critical or essential tools
are available on Secretariat-managed servers. As part of this effort,
IDnits and RFCdiff have been relocated. You can find them at:
http://www.ietf.org/tools/idnits/
http://www.ietf.org/tools/rfcdiff/
Going forward,
Probing each time when a new digit arrives does not seem reasonable to me.
Hi. I have a couple of phones on my desk, but the one I use the most
is a two-line phone, one's an ILEC POTS line, the other's an analog
VoIP terminal adapter. I have some numbers on speed dial but I often
dial numbers
In message 201010211458.o9lew8ta020...@fs4113.wdf.sap.corp, Martin Rex writes
:
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 9:55 PM, Mark Andrews ma...@isc.org wrote:
The DNS is not just name to address translation.
It doesn't really matter what DNS translates, all translations
are equally untrusted.
Total of 58 messages in the last 7 days.
script run at: Fri Oct 22 00:53:02 EDT 2010
Messages | Bytes| Who
+--++--+
12.07% |7 | 16.82% |78546 | hal...@gmail.com
13.79% |8 | 8.18% |38193 |
11 matches
Mail list logo
