On Jan 10, 2011, at 5:38 PM, Fred Baker wrote:
On Jan 10, 2011, at 5:56 AM, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
You can go, read the poster and formulate opinions and questions
independently of anyone else, including the author. If there is a time when
the author is supposed to be present, you can
--On Tuesday, January 11, 2011 09:32 +0200 Yoav Nir
y...@checkpoint.com wrote:
We can have as high a barrier as necessary to ensure there are
no more than, say, 12 posters.
Yes, but that is another aspect of why I don't want to go down
this path. As soon as you say high barrier, you imply
--On Saturday, January 08, 2011 07:37 -0800 Lixia Zhang
li...@cs.ucla.edu wrote:
I am not sure why this rush to get a new internet draft out,
without consultation to any of its original authors, and given
the rough consensus on ietf mailing list discussion is to keep
NETBLT RFC as is
On 10/Jan/11 23:38, Fred Baker wrote:
Personally, call me stuck-in-the-mud, but this isn't an academic
conference in which grad students are advertising for a professor
that might be interested in mentoring them or a sponsor might fund
their research. This is an SDO, and internet drafts are
Speaking personally, with none of my official hats on, I would offer the IETF
is *only* an SDO.
There are no sponsoring organizations, because the IETF is a collection of
individuals. No sponsor needed. For that matter, some individuals consider
some sponsors toxic, so sometimes having a
- Original Message -
From: Brian F. G. Bidulock bidul...@openss7.org
To: Mykyta Yevstifeyev evniki...@gmail.com
Cc: Bob Hinden bob.hin...@gmail.com; ts...@ietf.org; IETF Discussion
ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2011 9:06 AM
Mykyta,
RDP is still in use (I know of companies
11.01.2011 13:28, t.petch wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Mykyta Yevstifeyevevniki...@gmail.com
To: Joe Touchto...@isi.edu
Cc: t.petchie...@btconnect.com;go...@erg.abdn.ac.uk
Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2011 10:24 AM
Joe,
2011/1/10, Joe Touchto...@isi.edu:
On 1/7/2011 9:16 PM,
11.01.2011 13:36, t.petch wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Brian F. G. Bidulockbidul...@openss7.org
To: Mykyta Yevstifeyevevniki...@gmail.com
Cc: Bob Hindenbob.hin...@gmail.com;ts...@ietf.org; IETF Discussion
ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2011 9:06 AM
Mykyta,
RDP is still
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 12:24:37PM +0100, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
My ignorance of IETF's inner functioning is so deep that I cannot even
tell what is the equivalent of a mentoring professor or a sponsoring
organization within the IETF, let alone finding one. As an Internet
user, I may have a
What are the IPR constraints here?
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 2:08 AM, Hannes Tschofenig
hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net wrote:
The Internet Architecture Board and the IETF Internet Area will hold a
workshop on the Friday, 25th March 2011 in Prague on the topic:
Interconnecting Smart
Hi Phillip,
What are the IPR constraints here?
Note well does not apply. That's how I handled it with other workshops
as well.
I wanted to explicitly point to this at the beginning of the workshop
but it could be useful to put it on the webpage. I was just worried that
it will confuse people
tn3270 is a widely used protocol but also a venerable one, so it is a little
surprising that the IETF is to register a provisional URI for it at this stage.
I have always seen it as an IBM protocol, and while that is no bar to being
an RFC - there are plenty of Cisco or Microsoft parallels - I am
At issue though is that these individuals get paid (sponsored) by
someone, either directly or indirectly by corporations and/or
governments.
-Original Message-
From: ietf-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Eric Burger
Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2011 7:27 AM
To:
Phillip,
Are you asking if the IETF¹s disclosure rules apply? I believe they do.
Presentation or participation in the workshop would seem to satisfy the
second part of the definition of an IETF Contribution as stated in RFC 3979:
c. IETF Contribution: ³... and any
statement made within
Hi -
From: t.petch daedu...@btconnect.com
To: Mykyta Yevstifeyev evniki...@gmail.com; IETF Discussion
ietf@ietf.org
Cc: iesg i...@ietf.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2011 8:29 AM
Subject: Last Call On draft-yevstifeyev-tn3270-uri-12
The provenance of the editor is unknown to
me -
Hi -
From: DOLLY, MARTIN C (ATTSI) md3...@att.com
To: Eric Burger ebur...@standardstrack.com; Alessandro Vesely
ves...@tana.it
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2011 4:34 AM
Subject: RE: SDO vs academic conference, was poster sessions
At issue though is that these individuals
--On Tuesday, January 11, 2011 10:35 -0800 Randy Presuhn
randy_pres...@mindspring.com wrote:
At issue though is that these individuals get paid
(sponsored) by someone, either directly or indirectly by
corporations and/or governments.
Not necessarily. Some of us have no employer and just
Fred said:
Personally, call me stuck-in-the-mud, but this isn't an academic conference in
which grad students are advertising for a professor that might be interested
in mentoring them or a sponsor might fund their research.
Ted said:
But you have to bring your own
engineering talent. It's
Dear Ben,
thank you very much for your thorough review of xmlers.
I corrected nearly all of the items you raised and sent the revised
version to my co-authors for approval and publication as version -10. On
a note of further language style improvement beyond your comments, the
AD advised us at
On Jan 10, 2011, at 2:38 PM, Fred Baker wrote:
I'm envisioning the process and requirements of the poster sessions. In terms
of process, today if I post a -00 draft to a working group, I can generally
get discussion during the coming IETF meeting. What I think this suggests is
that instead
At 08:29 11-01-11, t.petch wrote:
The provenance of the editor is unknown to
me - and of course, once an RFC has been through the IETF processes,
then the editorship is an irrelevance - but I am concerned that I have
no awareness of the contact provided as the scheme 'Author/Change controller',
Dear all,
I think that if there is an objetion of many people, that would be OK
if we put the IETF as author and IESG as contact. This, I think, will
be considered as appropriate for this ocasion.
Moreover, if I do not want to provide my contact data except email to
the community, that is my
Hi all,
In case you have not read through the announcement text I wanted to draw your
attention to the tutorial day (Saturday, 26th March 2011) that is attached to
the workshop.
The tutorials are open for everyone BUT there are two constraints:
1) We have to limit the number of
The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'The Trickle Algorithm'
(draft-ietf-roll-trickle-08.txt) as a Proposed Standard
This document is the product of the Routing Over Low power and Lossy
networks Working Group.
The IESG contact persons are Adrian Farrel and Stewart Bryant.
A URL of
The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider
the following document:
- 'Elliptic Curve Algorithms for Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)
Asymmetric Key Package Content Type'
draft-turner-akf-algs-update-02.txt as a Proposed Standard
This document includes
The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'A Mixer Control Package for the Media Control Channel Framework'
(draft-ietf-mediactrl-mixer-control-package-14.txt) as a Proposed
Standard
This document is the product of the Media Server Control Working Group.
The IESG contact persons are
26 matches
Mail list logo
