Re: tsv-dir review of draft-ymbk-aplusp-08

2011-02-08 Thread Masataka Ohta
Pasi Sarolahti wrote: My comments are as an implementer of a port restricted IP. * The typical initial scenario probably is that an A+P gateway is NATing the traffic to a legacy host in private address realm, but I understood that if a host/application supports A+P, it could use A+P

RE: Last Call: draft-ietf-pwe3-fc-encap-14.txt (Encapsulation Methods for Transport of Fibre Channel Traffic over MPLS Networks) to Proposed Standard

2011-02-08 Thread david.black
This IETF draft contains normative references to three Fibre Channel standards that are developed by INCITS Technical Committee T11 (www.t11.org) - FC-BB-6, FC-FS-2 and FC-SP. FC-BB-6 is under active development at T11, and hence its latest working draft (revision 1.02) is publicly available

Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.txt (Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) Procedures for the Management of the Service Name and Transport Protocol Port Number Registry) to BCP

2011-02-08 Thread Chris Benson
Hi folks, Sam Hartman wrote (and others suggest): I think that being able to discuss concerns with reviewers and being able to consider potential conflicts and other issues mean that an open dialogue with identified reviewers is an important part of our process. Anonymous contributions

Review of draft-ietf-netconf-4741bis-07

2011-02-08 Thread Tina Tsou
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like

RE: Last Call: draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.txt (Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) Procedures for the Management of the Service Name and Transport Protocol Port Number Registry) to BCP

2011-02-08 Thread Christian Huitema
I don't see that public identity (of expert reviewers) is required for interactive discussion. Or would anonymous interaction fail a Turing test of some kind? Public identity is required for reviewer accountability. It is easy to imagine how withholding registration of some required

Re: [TLS] Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-rfc4347-bis-04.txt (Datagram Transport Layer Security version 1.2) to Proposed Standard

2011-02-08 Thread Eric Rescorla
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Juho Vähä-Herttua juh...@iki.fi wrote: On 20.12.2010, at 15.15, Pekka Savola wrote: 3.2.3. Message Size   TLS and DTLS handshake messages can be quite large (in theory up to   2^24-1 bytes, in practice many kilobytes).  By contrast, UDP   datagrams are often

RE: Last Call: draft-ietf-sipcore-199-05.txt (Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Response Code for Indication of Terminated Dialog) to Proposed Standard

2011-02-08 Thread Worley, Dale R (Dale)
From: ietf-boun...@ietf.org [ietf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Cullen Jennings [flu...@cisco.com] I am still not aware of any use case where this actually helps. I searched the IETF and WG lists for email with the subject draft-ietf-sipcore-199 and I

Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.txt (Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) Procedures for the Management of the Service Name and Transport Protocol Port Number Registry) to BCP

2011-02-08 Thread Bob Hinden
On Feb 8, 2011, at 9:41 PM, Christian Huitema wrote: I don't see that public identity (of expert reviewers) is required for interactive discussion. Or would anonymous interaction fail a Turing test of some kind? Public identity is required for reviewer accountability. It is easy to

RFC 6071 on IP Security (IPsec) and Internet Key Exchange (IKE) Document Roadmap

2011-02-08 Thread rfc-editor
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 6071 Title: IP Security (IPsec) and Internet Key Exchange (IKE) Document Roadmap Author: S. Frankel, S. Krishnan Status: Informational

Additional Last Call: draft-nsri-tls-aria-01.txt (Addition of the ARIA Cipher Suites to Transport Layer Security (TLS)) to Informational RFC

2011-02-08 Thread The IESG
The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider the following document: - 'Addition of the ARIA Cipher Suites to Transport Layer Security (TLS)' draft-nsri-tls-aria-01.txt as an Informational RFC Last calls were earlier issued on version -01 of this document and this