Dave CROCKER wrote:
?> In Section 5.8:
"DKIM-aware authoring MLMs MUST sign the mail they send according to
the regular signing guidelines given in [DKIM].
One concern is that having an MLM apply its signature to unsigned
mail might cause some verifiers or receivers to interpret
At 11:03 23-05-2011, Dave CROCKER wrote:
Then you are using criteria that go beyond the requirements of a BCP.
From RFC 2026:
"5. BEST CURRENT PRACTICE (BCP) RFCs
The BCP subseries of the RFC series is designed to be a way to
standardize practices and the results of communi
> Nothing in the definition of BCPs require that it be limited to
> covering existing practice.
Well, other than the naive assumption that something called a Best
Current Practices would in fact document best current practices.
But since this argument seems to be all about proving that we've
foll
On 5/13/2011 12:15 AM, SM wrote:
Although one can extrapolate from experience and provide some
guidance, I would not call it "Best Current Practices". I suggest a
change to that sentence:
Based on deployment experience with DKIM, this document provides
guidance for the use of DKIM w
