On 8/9/2011 9:52 PM, Wes Hardaker wrote:
On Mon, 08 Aug 2011 12:58:32 +0700, Glen Zorn g...@net-zen.net said:
GZ In any case, a taxi from any of the hotels on the list would today
GZ cost $3 (probably closer to $2) one way.
I'd argue that group shuttles, as has been done in the past, is
On 8/10/2011 5:12 AM, Dean Willis wrote:
...
Y'all come on down to Dallas. It was 39C while I was walking the dog
last night, down from the daily peak of about 44C. We're looking
forward to October, when the highs should drop to 32C. And the lows
to around zero pack a sweater.
And
Hi Carsten,
At 11:46 09-08-2011, Carsten Bormann wrote:
For another perspective on this, see section 2.7 The fallacy of
perfection in Garrulity and Fluff.
(http://www.iab.org/wp-content/IAB-uploads/2011/04/Bormann.pdf)
That's an interesting document. From Section 2.1:
The worst source of
On Wed, 10 Aug 2011, Philip Smith wrote:
When APRICOT comes back to Bangkok in the future (it is a wonderful
conference/convention city), the subway will make the location much more
favourable, although I think the APIA Board will want to consider other
venues too in light of the previous
Just on the topic of political unrest: Once the situation rises to the
level of international news, all bets are off. Regardless of the
actual danger, companies (and even countries) will issue travel bans
or advisories which makes it impossible to have a normal meeting.
Last year's
SM wrote:
Hi Carsten,
At 11:46 09-08-2011, Carsten Bormann wrote:
For another perspective on this, see section 2.7 The fallacy of
perfection in Garrulity and Fluff.
(http://www.iab.org/wp-content/IAB-uploads/2011/04/Bormann.pdf)
That's an interesting document. From Section 2.1:
Yes, it is
On 8/10/2011 3:06 PM, Ole Jacobsen wrote:
...
I would NOT want to be in the business of moving an IETF meeting 2
months before the event.
Certainly not, but all hell can break loose with little or no warning
virtually anywhere (see
http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/2011/08/london_riots.html).
On Tue, 9 Aug 2011, Dean Willis wrote:
We're tougher than you think, Ole!
--
Dean
Judging by the whining, I sometimes wonder :-)
Ole's iPad
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Dear Gang,
On Aug 9, 2011, at 7:14 PM, GangChen wrote:
Dear Jouni,
In mobile CPE case, MT and TE are separated. That would need
additional requirements in some particular cases, e.g. dynamic IPv6
address allocation.
Separate MT TE is part of the existing 3GPP specifications. There is
Marshall, thank you very much for the review.
Some of my comments are inline.
On 6/30/11 7:22 AM, Marshall Eubanks marshall.euba...@gmail.com wrote:
I've reviewed this document as part of the transport area directorate's
ongoing effort to review key IETF documents. These comments were
On 10.08.2011 08:58, SM wrote:
The reality is whatever the IETF thinks of the principles of Internet
architecture, operators will violate those principles when the latter
conflicts with their core value; which is about making money. In simple
terms, that protocol that has been designed to do
Hi Ben,
Thanks for reading.
Nits/editorial comments:
-- section 1, paragraph 4: ...with relation to the programming...
... in relation to...
Yeah. RFC Editor note if Stewart is watching (although I'm guessing the RFC
Editor might just fix this anyway).
-- 3.1, last paragraph:
Note
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you
may receive.
Document: draft-ietf-lisp-lig-04
Reviewer: Mary
I'm curious -- why was a new list created, when there's already a (fairly
quiet) clouds@ mailing list?
(just trying to reduce the absurd number of mailing lists I need to follow)
Begin forwarded message:
From: IETF Secretariat ietf-secretar...@ietf.org
Subject: New Non-WG Mailing List: sami
On Aug 4, 2011, at 6:45 AM, Michael Richardson wrote:
Marc == Marc Petit-Huguenin petit...@acm.org writes:
Marc I personally would like to switch to the Tufte style,
Marc (i.e. uploading a printout, which can also be distributed to
Marc people before the meeting in printed form,
The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'MPLS-TP Linear Protection'
(draft-ietf-mpls-tp-linear-protection-09.txt) as a Proposed Standard
This document is the product of the Multiprotocol Label Switching Working
Group.
The IESG contact persons are Adrian Farrel and Stewart Bryant.
A
The CLUE WG will hold an interim virtual meeting on:
2011-08-23, 16.00-18.00 GMT (starting at 9.00 Pacific, 11.00 Central, 12.00
Eastern)
Agenda and details will be announced on the CLUE WG mailing list
(http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/clue/) as soon as available.
The DRINKS Working Group will hold an interim virtual meeting on
Wednesday, August 31, 2011, from 1:00 PM - 5:00 PM (Eastern).
Call-in details and preliminary agenda were announced on the DRINKS
WG mailing list at
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/drinks/current/msg00960.html.
18 matches
Mail list logo
