On Aug 12, 2011, at 10:24 PM, ned+i...@mauve.mrochek.com wrote:
>> So the question really goes to the mailman people: can we get an
>> option to make the prefix inclusion a subscriber option?
>
> I confess to being more than a little perplexed as to why you and others think
> this idea in and of
> So the question really goes to the mailman people: can we get an
> option to make the prefix inclusion a subscriber option?
I confess to being more than a little perplexed as to why you and others think
this idea in and of itself is a useful solution to anything.
The problem with putting tags i
I support publication of this RFC.
+1
Ned
Tony Hansen
t...@att.com
On 8/11/2011 9:37 AM, The IESG wrote:
> The IESG has received a request from the Yet Another Mail WG (yam) to
> consider the following document:
> - 'Message Submission for Mail'
>
On 8/11/2011 9:37 AM, The IESG wrote:
> The IESG has received a request from the Yet Another Mail WG (yam) to
> consider the following document:
> - 'Message Submission for Mail'
> as a Full Standard
>
> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
> final comments on
On 2011-08-12, at 12:39 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: ietf-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tony
>> Hansen
>> Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2011 9:02 PM
>> To: ietf@ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: Last Call: (Message
>> Submission for M
