RE: Last Call draft-sprecher-mpls-tp-oam-considerations-01.txt (The Reasons for Selecting a Single Solution for MPLS-TP OAM) to Informational RFC

2011-10-13 Thread Rolf Winter
How does the IETF put a big red warning sign on a document produced by another standards body? http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bhh-mpls-tp-oam-y1731-07. Actual coloring of course is impossible. NEC Europe Limited | Registered Office: NEC House, 1 Victoria Road, London W3 6BL | Registered in

Re: size of the XML of IANA ports

2011-10-13 Thread t.petch
Joe When I access it, I see a 3.08Mbyte .xml file in temporary storage. Interestingly, the text variant is still 2.7Mbyte. My access time is variable. When I first used the xml file, the access time was always in minutes, time to make a coffee, come back and continue waiting. Now it is

Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-cuss-sip-uui-reqs-06

2011-10-13 Thread Ben Campbell
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-cuss-sip-uui-reqs-06

Re: meeting slots

2011-10-13 Thread Robert Sparks
I understand Dave's concern, but I think it would be valuable to make it easy to see what has been requested. Any changes to the conflict list would still have to come through the chairs, encouraging that distributed work model. I've entered this as an idea that someone might pick up for work

Re: size of the XML of IANA ports

2011-10-13 Thread Joel jaeggli
On 10/13/11 03:41 , t.petch wrote: Joe When I access it, I see a 3.08Mbyte .xml file in temporary storage. Interestingly, the text variant is still 2.7Mbyte. My access time is variable. When I first used the xml file, the access time was always in minutes, time to make a coffee, come

Re: size of the XML of IANA ports

2011-10-13 Thread Joe Touch
Hi, all, Again, thanks for the suggestions. I'll work with IANA to see if we can make things a bit more useful. Joe On 10/13/2011 12:28 PM, Joel jaeggli wrote: On 10/13/11 03:41 , t.petch wrote: Joe When I access it, I see a 3.08Mbyte .xml file in temporary storage. Interestingly, the text

Re: [IETF] Re: watersprings.org archive of expired Internet Drafts

2011-10-13 Thread Warren Kumari
On Oct 7, 2011, at 5:36 AM, t.petch daedu...@btconnect.com wrote: I had been waiting a while for a quiet moment on the list to express my regret at the passing of Watersprings - R.I.P. Well, you will probably be glad to hear that it is in the process of being resurrected. It was down to

Re: Last Call: draft-salter-rfc5430bis-01.txt (Suite B Profile for Transport Layer Security (TLS)) to Informational RFC

2011-10-13 Thread Russ Housley
Nikos: The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider the following document: - 'Suite B Profile for Transport Layer Security (TLS)' draft-salter-rfc5430bis-01.txt as an Informational RFC The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits

Re: Last Call: draft-sprecher-mpls-tp-oam-considerations-01.txt (The Reasons for Selecting a Single Solution for MPLS-TP OAM) to Informational RFC

2011-10-13 Thread Malcolm . BETTS
Below are my comments on this draft, these are in addition to the comments that I have provided previously. I also support the comments that propose the deletion of sections 4, 5 and 6. I have numbered my comments (1-12) to simplify identification for those who wish to respond. I do not

Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org

2011-10-13 Thread Thomas Narten
Total of 98 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Oct 14 00:53:02 EDT 2011 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 4.08% |4 | 9.50% |74596 | malcolm.be...@zte.com.cn 5.10% |5 | 4.94% |38766 |