Hi David,
Thank you for your review. Comments inline:
--On December 27, 2011 11:07:49 PM -0500 david.bl...@emc.com wrote:
[1] -Major- Section 3.5 does not appear to cover the case reporting added
elements on a subsequent synchronization. The problem may be that the
word changed as used in
The IESG has received a request from the Managed Incident Lightweight
Exchange WG (mile) to consider the following document:
- 'Real-time Inter-network Defense (RID)'
draft-ietf-mile-rfc6045-bis-05.txt as a Proposed Standard
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider
the following document:
- 'Transmission of Syslog Messages over TCP'
draft-gerhards-syslog-plain-tcp-13.txt as an Historic RFC
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this
The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'Happy Eyeballs: Success with Dual-Stack Hosts'
(draft-ietf-v6ops-happy-eyeballs-07.txt) as a Proposed Standard
This document is the product of the IPv6 Operations Working Group.
The IESG contact persons are Ron Bonica and Dan Romascanu.
A URL
