On 27/Feb/12 21:30, Patrik Fältström wrote:
Yes, a pain. But...we just must be able to get new RRTypes
deployed. And not give up.
I agree it is a praiseworthy task to pursue the diffusion of unknown
RRTypes. However, it cannot be piggybacked on client protocols, that
have their own
It may be intentional or not. But one of the designs has the eiffel
tower centered on the wearer's crotch area. This makes for an
interesting visual effect when worn
A previous conference at which I attended (1st Web conference) had a
similar unfortunate juxtaposition with the Jet D'Eau in Lake
John Levine jo...@iecc.com wrote:
I'm still hoping to get some more feedback on
draft-levine-dnsextlang-02.txt
We believe in rough consensus and running code.
I'm happy to contribute to the rough consensus once I see running
code, perpaps for bind and perl-script registrar
On Feb 28, 2012, at 7:17 AM, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
It may be intentional or not. But one of the designs has the eiffel
tower centered on the wearer's crotch area. This makes for an
interesting visual effect when worn
I suspect you might be referring to my submission of the Eiffel
John Leslie wrote:
John Levine jo...@iecc.com wrote:
I'm still hoping to get some more feedback on
draft-levine-dnsextlang-02.txt
We believe in rough consensus and running code.
I'm happy to contribute to the rough consensus once I see running
code, perpaps for bind and perl-script
On 2/27/2012 5:56 PM, John Levine wrote:
The problem is provisioning software. We weenies can stuff anything
into our DNS servers we want, because we use vi and emacs and (in my
case) custom perl scripts. For the other 99.5% of the world, what
they can put in their DNS zones is limited to
Doug Barton do...@dougbarton.us wrote:
On 2/27/2012 5:56 PM, John Levine wrote:
The problem is provisioning software. We weenies can stuff anything
into our DNS servers we want, because we use vi and emacs and (in my
case) custom perl scripts. For the other 99.5% of the world, what
they
-Original Message-
From: ietf-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Doug
Barton
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2012 2:24 PM
To: John Levine
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with
Intelligent sysadmin: We need to deploy SPF
Boss: How
In message 0b7e91ed-d286-4065-a91a-79032bf6a...@email.android.com, Scott Kitte
rman writes:
Doug Barton do...@dougbarton.us wrote:
On 2/27/2012 5:56 PM, John Levine wrote:
The problem is provisioning software. We weenies can stuff anything
into our DNS servers we want, because we
In your little dialog, the boss was entirely reasonable -- the practical
benefit from implementing SPF records would be zip.
Or, put more simply, your conclusion seems to be that we can never add
new RRs. Given that adding new RRs is crucial to the growth of the
Internet, I reject that
In message 9452079d1a51524aa5749ad23e00392804c...@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.co
m, Murray S. Kucherawy writes:
-Original Message-
From: ietf-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Doug
Barton
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2012 2:24 PM
To: John Levine
Cc:
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
Document:
On Wednesday, February 29, 2012 10:17:52 AM Mark Andrews wrote:
In message
9452079d1a51524aa5749ad23e00392804c...@exch-mbx901.corp.cloudmark.co
m, Murray S. Kucherawy writes:
-Original Message-
From: ietf-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf
Of Doug
On Tuesday, February 28, 2012 02:23:30 PM Doug Barton wrote:
On 2/27/2012 5:56 PM, John Levine wrote:
The problem is provisioning software. We weenies can stuff anything
into our DNS servers we want, because we use vi and emacs and (in my
case) custom perl scripts. For the other 99.5% of
Scott Kitterman wrote:
If your DNS hosting company doesn't support them find another one
or complain to them. You are paying them to host your DNS services
and this is a basic part of the job.
To what hosting company should I switch if I want to publish SPF records of
Type SPF?
SMTP
On Tuesday, February 28, 2012 07:52:37 PM Hector wrote:
Scott Kitterman wrote:
If your DNS hosting company doesn't support them find another one
or complain to them. You are paying them to host your DNS services
and this is a basic part of the job.
To what hosting company should I
Mark Andrews wrote:
...
If your DNS hosting company doesn't support them find another one
or complain to them. You are paying them to host your DNS services
and this is a basic part of the job.
+1.
We have our own primary server and use GoDaddy as my domains
registrar. I have all my
If your DNS hosting company doesn't support them find another one
or complain to them. You are paying them to host your DNS services
and this is a basic part of the job.
Can you suggest some DNS hosting companies that provide support for
provisioning SPF records? I'm not aware of any.
R's,
In message 20120229013632.9326.qm...@joyce.lan, John Levine writes:
If your DNS hosting company doesn't support them find another one
or complain to them. You are paying them to host your DNS services
and this is a basic part of the job.
Can you suggest some DNS hosting companies that
SPF is listed. http://dyn.com/dns/dns-comparison/
Hmmn, only on the premium $30/mo and up packages, not on the cheap ones.
There must be a moral here.
By the way, what do you think of draft-levine-dnsextlang-02 ?
Regards,
John Levine, jo...@iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of The Internet for
In the previous message it was suggested that people who use a hosted DNS
service should switch if their service doesn't support Type SPF. The problem
is that, as far as I'm aware, none of them do.
Perhaps in some cases it's because the person or persons who want to publish
SPF records are
Godaddy, basic domain hosting at $10 per .com, allows you to set an SPF
record.
Stephan
On 2.28.2012 17:56 , John R. Levine jo...@iecc.com wrote:
SPF is listed. http://dyn.com/dns/dns-comparison/
Hmmn, only on the premium $30/mo and up packages, not on the cheap ones.
There must be a moral
On Wednesday, February 29, 2012 02:51:24 AM Stephan Wenger wrote:
Godaddy, basic domain hosting at $10 per .com, allows you to set an SPF
record.
Stephan
Of type TXT or type SPF? I checked with someone who has domains at Go Daddy
and they couldn't find a mechanism for publishing Type SPF
Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Wednesday, February 29, 2012 02:51:24 AM Stephan Wenger wrote:
Godaddy, basic domain hosting at $10 per .com, allows you to set an SPF
record.
Stephan
Of type TXT or type SPF? I checked with someone who has domains at Go Daddy
and they couldn't find a mechanism for
On Wednesday, February 29, 2012 12:02:13 AM Hector wrote:
Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Wednesday, February 29, 2012 02:51:24 AM Stephan Wenger wrote:
Godaddy, basic domain hosting at $10 per .com, allows you to set an
SPF
record.
Stephan
Of type TXT or type SPF? I checked with
Confirmed. The menu option says add SPF, but you end up with a TXT
record.
Embarrassed,
Stephan
On 2.28.2012 21:11 , Scott Kitterman sc...@kitterman.com wrote:
On Wednesday, February 29, 2012 12:02:13 AM Hector wrote:
Scott Kitterman wrote:
On Wednesday, February 29, 2012 02:51:24 AM Stephan
The IESG has received a request from the Congestion and Pre-Congestion
Notification WG (pcn) to consider the following document:
- 'Encoding 3 PCN-States in the IP header using a single DSCP'
draft-ietf-pcn-3-in-1-encoding-08.txt as a Proposed Standard
The IESG plans to make a decision in the
First, a hearty thanks to the twelve people who submitted a design for our
t-shirt contest. And thank you to everyone in the community who took a moment
to vote for your favorite. We have a winner!
Rosita Pin (http://www.vanderpin.net/) submitted the winning design, which you
can purchase
28 matches
Mail list logo
