Re: [mile] Last Call: draft-ietf-mile-template-04.txt (Guidelines for Defining Extensions to IODEF) to Informational RFC

2012-05-21 Thread Peter Saint-Andre
On 5/18/12 6:13 AM, Brian Trammell wrote: Hi, Peter, all, Many thanks for the comments; And to you for following up. replies inline... Likewise. On May 17, 2012, at 5:25 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: On 5/16/12 3:53 PM, The IESG wrote: The IESG has received a request from the

Re: Updated secdir review of draft-ietf-emu-chbind-15.txt

2012-05-21 Thread Sam Hartman
Stephen == Stephen Hanna sha...@juniper.net writes: Stephen The changes in draft-ietf-emu-chbind-15.txt satisfactorily Stephen address almost all of the comments in my April 13, 2012 Stephen secdir review. I do have one remaining substantive comment Stephen on this latest draft

Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-irtf-dtnrg-prophet-09.txt

2012-05-21 Thread The IESG
The IESG has completed a review of draft-irtf-dtnrg-prophet consistent with RFC5742. This review is applied to all non-IETF streams. The IESG has concluded that there is no conflict between this document and IETF work. The IESG has no problem with the publication of 'Probabilistic Routing