On 5/31/2012 8:36 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
Have we any evidence that this is a problem for the community? The informal
style is one of the virtues of the Tao. I'd be sorry to lose it.
Let's separate use of colloquial language from overall writing style.
It is possible to write in an info
On 2012-05-31 02:49, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> Overall I continue to think that this is a helpful document, as were its
> predecessors.
>
> That said, I would assume that many potential readers of this document
> are not native English speakers. Thus I suggest that the more colloquial
> words and
On 2012-05-31 07:22, Eliot Lear wrote:
...
> * I've been told by some that the Mission of the IETF is in some way
> out of date. I don't know whether this is true,
That sound like somebody's personal opinion, but it is still a BCP
and therefore still represents IETF consensus.
> but
Hi,
I agree with much of what Peter Saint-Andre wrote. In addition I
suggest the following changes:
* I've been told by some that the Mission of the IETF is in some way
out of date. I don't know whether this is true, but if it is, the
reference should be removed.
* It's probably wor
Overall I continue to think that this is a helpful document, as were its
predecessors.
That said, I would assume that many potential readers of this document
are not native English speakers. Thus I suggest that the more colloquial
words and phrases might best be changed to more standard English.
N
--- Begin Message ---
Topics:
[Ietf-krb-wg] Add. comments on Kdc model, WAS[Re: I-D Action:
draft-ietf-krb-wg-kdc-model-12.txt]
Re: [Ietf-krb-wg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-krb-wg-kdc-model-12.txt
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
I have additional comments.
These following 3 attribu
[I'm going to forward Simo's original comments to the IETF list because
this doc is in IETF last call.
Here are my responses as chair.
]
> "Simo" == Simo Sorce writes:
Simo> 4.1.1.5. principalNumberOfFailedAuthenticationAttempts
Simo>This single-valued integer attribute contains
Hi All,
as noted in the maillist announcement of IETF secretary "coma" maillist
is for the discussion on the management of constrained networks and
devices. The mailing list will discuss and identify the issues and
requirements and objectives for the management of devices in such an
environment wi
Folks,
Periodically someone wants to ask a question about ABNF, suggest an
enhancement or otherwise exchange views about ABNF. There has not been
an obvious forum for this. This sometimes means that Paul Overell and I
get queried, as authors of the relevant RFC. For quick items, that's
fin
Hi,
The inclusion of the template as an Appendix in the document is
confusing - right now A.1 through A.7 define sections in the future
I-Ds, while A.8 and A.9 describe appendices in the future I-D. This
document has two sections each titled Appendix A and Appendix B.
Moreover, this inclusion has
10 matches
Mail list logo
