To be fair, nearly half the attendees come from that continent. Even when the
meetings are held in Taipei or Paris.
-Original Message-
From: ietf-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Randy
Bush
Sent: 10 June 2012 03:33
To: Glen Zorn
Cc: IETF Disgust
Subject: Re:
Original Message -
From: ssakane ssak...@cisco.com
To: t.p. daedu...@btconnect.com
Cc: draft-sakane-dhc-dhcpv6-kdc-opt...@tools.ietf.org;
sec...@ietf.org; ietf ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2012 1:55 AM
Removing the section 4.1 to an Appendix is nicer idea rather than just
This draft should formally obsolete RFC 4677. Otherwise, I think it's fine.
This doesn't need to be in the document, but having a fixed location for
the pending version might be good, e.g. http://www.ietf.org/draft-tao.html .
Regards
Brian Carpenter
In July 2013, the IETF will hold a meeting in Berlin. We are a only little
over a year away from that meeting, and we do not yet have a host.
We have had some conversations with potentially interested parties, we do not
at this point have a host for the meeting. We want sign up a host as soon
The intended rotation cycle is still 1-1-1 for NA-EU-AP regions, but
it's all dependent on finding suitable and available venues and
willing hosts and sponsors. Changing the text of the document would
imply a change in policy or normal state of things which there
hasn't been.
Hmm. So a
On Sun, 10 Jun 2012, John Levine wrote:
Old:
Currently, the IETF meets in North America, Europe, and Asia,
approximately once a year in each region.
New:
Currently, the IETF meets in North America, Europe, and Asia. The
intention is to meet once a year in each region,
Oh, one thing I now realise is that the draft doesn't state that
the editor (in deciding what changes to adopt) and the IESG
(in approving an update) will of course do so by a normal IETF
consensus process (presumably ad hoc last calls) and subject
to appeal like anything else. This is so obvious
Currently, the IETF meets in North America, Europe, and Asia. The
intention is to meet once a year in each region, although due to
scheduling issues there are often more meetings in North America
and fewer in Asia.
s/intention/intent/
On Jun 10, 2012, at 9:00 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
Oh, one thing I now realise is that the draft doesn't state that
the editor (in deciding what changes to adopt) and the IESG
(in approving an update) will of course do so by a normal IETF
consensus process (presumably ad hoc last calls)
Adding to what SM already wrote (and yes, I've reread the whole document):
On 1 Jun 2012, at 21:23, SM s...@resistor.net wrote:
At 09:42 01-06-2012, IESG Secretary wrote:
The IESG has received a request from the TLS Working Group to reclassify RFC
2818 (HTTP Over TLS) to Proposed Standard.
10 matches
Mail list logo
