Enke Chen enkec...@cisco.com wrote:
On 6/12/12 7:25 AM, Stewart Bryant wrote:
From: Claudio Jeker cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 11:30:11AM +0100, Stewart Bryant wrote:
On 01/06/2012 23:00, Claudio Jeker wrote:
On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 11:54:44AM -0700, The IESG wrote:
Thanks for the detailed review, comments are in-lined...
From: Roni Even [mailto:ron.even@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2012 2:20 PM
To: draft-ietf-nea-pt-tls@tools.ietf.org
Cc: 'IETF'; gen-...@ietf.org
Subject: GenART LC review of draft-ietf-nea-pt-tls-05
I am the assigned Gen-ART
-Original Message-
From: Alexey Melnikov [mailto:alexey.melni...@isode.com]
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2012 12:02 PM
To: apps-disc...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-nea-pt-tls@tools.ietf.org
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-nea-pt-tls-04
I have been selected as the
-Original Message-
From: Alexey Melnikov [mailto:alexey.melni...@isode.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 3:47 AM
To: apps-disc...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-nea-pt-tls@tools.ietf.org
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-nea-pt-tls-04
On
Hey bro how are you I don't know what to now I am totally free so just hanging
around nothing to everything is just fine I am watching yaadein movie on some
channel I don't even know the name of the channel.. Ha ha...
Sent from my iPad
On 14-Jun-2012, at 21:41, ietf-requ...@ietf.org wrote:
Hi Paul,
On 14 Jun 2012, at 05:02, Paul Sangster paul_sangs...@symantec.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Alexey Melnikov [mailto:alexey.melni...@isode.com]
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2012 12:02 PM
To: apps-disc...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-nea-pt-tls@tools.ietf.org
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Hi Paul,
On 14/06/2012 05:11, Paul Sangster wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Alexey Melnikov [mailto:alexey.melni...@isode.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 3:47 AM
To: apps-disc...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-nea-pt-tls@tools.ietf.org
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR
Two things have occurred since the message below as sent to the IETF mail list.
First, we got a lawyer in Europe to do some investigation, and the inclusion
of the email address on the blue sheet will lead to trouble with the European
privacy laws. Second, Ted Hardie suggested that we could
On 6/14/12 3:37 PM, IETF Secretariat wrote:
List address: ietf-...@ietf.org
Is no one thinking ahead to the 822nd meeting of the IETF in the year
2258?!?
/psa
On Jun 14, 2012, at 5:44 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
On 6/14/12 3:37 PM, IETF Secretariat wrote:
List address: ietf-...@ietf.org
Is no one thinking ahead to the 822nd meeting of the IETF in the year
2258?!?
Who cares about that? I think that it is *vital* that we discuss RFC 85 and
On Jun 14, 2012, at 5:55 PM, Warren Kumari wrote:
On Jun 14, 2012, at 5:44 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
On 6/14/12 3:37 PM, IETF Secretariat wrote:
List address: ietf-...@ietf.org
Is no one thinking ahead to the 822nd meeting of the IETF in the year
2258?!?
Who cares about that?
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
Document: draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484bis-05
Reviewer:
Total of 119 messages in the last 7 days.
script run at: Fri Jun 15 00:53:03 EDT 2012
Messages | Bytes| Who
+--++--+
12.61% | 15 | 18.08% | 190700 | stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie
5.88% |7 | 9.35% |98669 |
The IESG has received a request from the IP Performance Metrics WG (ippm)
to consider the following document:
- 'Ericsson TWAMP Value-Added Octets'
draft-ietf-ippm-twamp-value-added-octets-03.txt as Informational RFC
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final
The IESG has received a request from the Basic Level of Interoperability
for SIP Services WG (bliss) to consider the following document:
- 'Shared Appearances of a Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Address of
Record (AOR)'
draft-ietf-bliss-shared-appearances-11.txt as Proposed Standard
The
The IESG has received a request from the Network File System Version 4 WG
(nfsv4) to consider the following document:
- 'Administration Protocol for Federated Filesystems'
draft-ietf-nfsv4-federated-fs-admin-11.txt as Proposed Standard
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks,
16 matches
Mail list logo
