I agree that this sentence needs changed. However, I think that one other
sentence should be updated while we are dealing with the IAOC in this document.
RFC 3777 says:
Member Recall: This is the process by which the behavior of a sitting
member of the IESG or IAB may be questioned,
On 9/27/2012 8:26 AM, Russ Housley wrote:
I agree that this sentence needs changed. However, I think that one other
sentence should be updated while we are dealing with the IAOC in this document.
RFC 3777 says:
Member Recall: This is the process by which the behavior of a sitting
Dave:
I agree that this sentence needs changed. However, I think that one other
sentence should be updated while we are dealing with the IAOC in this
document.
RFC 3777 says:
Member Recall: This is the process by which the behavior of a sitting
member of the IESG or IAB may
On 9/26/2012 1:55 AM, Stephen Farrell wrote:
On 26 Sep 2012, at 03:18, tglassey tglas...@earthlink.net wrote:
The issue is how to remove the political BS which clouds so many initiatives.
Disagree that this is *the* issue. We also get technical BS and even stuff
that's utterly
On 9/27/2012 10:57 AM, Russ Housley wrote:
As for the earlier discussion seeking to exclude paid staff, I
think it odd to have criteria that would permit /any/ paid staff to
sit on Nomcom. We pay for a number of folk 'staff' folk to show up
and IETF meetings and none of them should qualify for
On 9/25/2012 9:03 AM, Abdussalam Baryun wrote:
Hi Dave,
Independent Stream authors well might not be part of the IETF -- always a strange line of
thinking, given that the IETF doesn't have members -- but that doesn't
mean that the Stream itself is outside the IETF.
Any I-D author MUST be
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Dave Crocker dcroc...@bbiw.net wrote:
So, to provide a specific example, you would be OK with having someone from
AMS on Nomcom?
d/
If they met the NomCom eligibility requirements by being a _registered
attendee_ for the requisite number of meetings, then
I have participated in the discussions leading to this version of the
document, and support its publication as an RFC. However, I have two
small editorial proposals and two typos that I would like to see
polished.
Thanks,
Adrian
---
Section 1
RFC 3777 specifies that sitting members of the
Good on both points; I will change both.
Barry
RFC 3777 says:
Member Recall: This is the process by which the behavior of a sitting
member of the IESG or IAB may be questioned, perhaps resulting in
the removal of the sitting member.
The community should also be able to recall an IAOC member.
As Dave says, that alters the
Total of 96 messages in the last 7 days.
script run at: Fri Sep 28 00:53:02 EDT 2012
Messages | Bytes| Who
+--++--+
9.38% |9 | 10.56% |72567 | hous...@vigilsec.com
8.33% |8 | 9.91% |68084 |
The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider
the following document:
- 'Update to RFC 3777 to Clarify Nominating Committee Eligibility of IETF
Leadership'
draft-leiba-3777upd-eligibility-04.txt as Best Current Practice
The IESG plans to make a decision in the
12 matches
Mail list logo
