Re: [dnsext] Last Call: draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2671bis-edns0-09.txt (Extension Mechanisms for DNS (EDNS(0))) to Internet Standard

2012-10-03 Thread SM
From Section 7 of the draft: Responders which choose not to implement the protocol extensions defined in this document MUST respond with a return code (RCODE) of FORMERR to messages containing an OPT RR in the additional section and MUST NOT include an OPT record in the response. That

Re: [dnsext] Last Call: draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2671bis-edns0-09.txt (Extension Mechanisms for DNS (EDNS(0))) to Internet Standard

2012-10-03 Thread John C Klensin
--On Wednesday, October 03, 2012 10:43 +0200 João Damas j...@bondis.org wrote: I believe you are saying the same things when you are both saying that for this to work there may be more than one way to do it but all options require completely new functionality in implementations (either by

Re: [dnsext] Last Call: draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2671bis-edns0-09.txt (Extension Mechanisms for DNS (EDNS(0))) to Internet Standard

2012-10-03 Thread John C Klensin
--On Tuesday, October 02, 2012 23:39 -0700 SM s...@resistor.net wrote: From Section 7 of the draft: Responders which choose not to implement the protocol extensions defined in this document MUST respond with a return code (RCODE) of FORMERR to messages containing an OPT RR in

Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-6man-udpchecksums-04

2012-10-03 Thread Peter Yee
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq Document: draft-ietf-6man-udpchecksums-04 Reviewer: Peter Yee Review Date: Sep-30-2012 IETF LC End Date: Oct-2-2012 IESG Telechat date:

MalcolmBETTS90013533 is out of the office.

2012-10-03 Thread Malcolm . BETTS
I will be out of the office starting 03/10/2012 and will not return until 22/10/2012. I will not have access to email, I will respond to your message when I return on October 22nd.

secdir review of draft-ietf-abfab-gss-eap-naming-05

2012-10-03 Thread Richard Barnes
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like

Re: secdir review of draft-ietf-abfab-gss-eap-naming-05

2012-10-03 Thread Sam Hartman
Richard == Richard Barnes rbar...@bbn.com writes: Richard I have reviewed this document as part of the security Richard directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents Richard being processed by the IESG. These comments were written Richard primarily for the benefit of

Document Action: 'Camellia Encryption for Kerberos 5' to Informational RFC (draft-ietf-krb-wg-camellia-cts-02.txt)

2012-10-03 Thread The IESG
The IESG has approved the following document: - 'Camellia Encryption for Kerberos 5' (draft-ietf-krb-wg-camellia-cts-02.txt) as Informational RFC This document is the product of the Kerberos Working Group. The IESG contact persons are Stephen Farrell and Sean Turner. A URL of this Internet

Last Call: draft-ietf-karp-ospf-analysis-05.txt (Analysis of OSPF Security According to KARP Design Guide) to Informational RFC

2012-10-03 Thread The IESG
The IESG has received a request from the Keying and Authentication for Routing Protocols WG (karp) to consider the following document: - 'Analysis of OSPF Security According to KARP Design Guide' draft-ietf-karp-ospf-analysis-05.txt as Informational RFC The IESG plans to make a decision in the

Last Call: draft-ietf-dhc-client-id-06.txt (Client Identifier Option in DHCP Server Replies) to Proposed Standard

2012-10-03 Thread The IESG
The IESG has received a request from the Dynamic Host Configuration WG (dhc) to consider the following document: - 'Client Identifier Option in DHCP Server Replies' draft-ietf-dhc-client-id-06.txt as Proposed Standard The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final