Weekly posting summary for ietf@ietf.org

2012-10-04 Thread Thomas Narten
Total of 27 messages in the last 7 days. script run at: Fri Oct 5 00:53:02 EDT 2012 Messages | Bytes| Who +--++--+ 18.52% |5 | 18.08% |35445 | john-i...@jck.com 14.81% |4 | 14.64% |28710 | ma...@isc.org 1

Re: [dnsext] Last Call: (Extension Mechanisms for DNS (EDNS(0))) to Internet Standard

2012-10-04 Thread Mark Andrews
In message <506dbe9b.3070...@ogud.com>, Olafur Gudmundsson writes: > On 02/10/2012 21:15, Mark Andrews wrote: > >> Labels only work when all the severs for a zone that has a new label type, > >> in ADDITION sufficient fraction servers in all zones above that zone > >> MUST understand the new > >>

Re: secdir review of draft-ietf-abfab-gss-eap-naming-05

2012-10-04 Thread Sam Hartman
> "Richard" == Richard Barnes writes: Richard> The security considerations in this document are difficult Richard> to evaluate because the general architecture is unclear to Richard> me, e.g., who attaches these names to things and who reads Richard> them. (The naming scheme

Re: [dnsext] Last Call: (Extension Mechanisms for DNS (EDNS(0))) to Internet Standard

2012-10-04 Thread Olafur Gudmundsson
On 02/10/2012 21:15, Mark Andrews wrote: Labels only work when all the severs for a zone that has a new label type, in ADDITION sufficient fraction servers in all zones above that zone MUST understand the new label type. Not true. Binary labels could have been made to work by removing the left