Randy,
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 10:59 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
> i started the thread on nanog. i am not sure abha or jon would want to
> be on such a list. remember them and honor and carry on their work,
> don't memorialize them.
>
I fully agree with you. However, unfortunately, a few years lat
I'm supportive of ideas in this space.
I agree with Adrian that it would be far better to include someone that
some people don't recognize as influencing the community than to ever
get into an argument about excluding someone.
I am happy if others work out the details and trust to the community to
On Oct 21, 2012, at 1:59 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
> i started the thread on nanog. i am not sure abha or jon would want to
> be on such a list. remember them and honor and carry on their work,
> don't memorialize them.
+1
i started the thread on nanog. i am not sure abha or jon would want to
be on such a list. remember them and honor and carry on their work,
don't memorialize them.
randy
While I applaud the idea, I have to agree with Benson here. --dmm
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Benson Schliesser
wrote:
> I feel a little bad saying this, because these individuals deserve
> recognition. But I rather think this memorial page is not a good idea.
>
> If the IETF is around long
--On Sunday, October 21, 2012 17:43 +0100 Adrian Farrel
wrote:
> In practice, that will mean, anyone who someone else thinks
> was a part of the community.
>
> It would not be seemly to squabble about whether someone had
> really played a significant part in the IETF, and would be
> better to
I feel a little bad saying this, because these individuals deserve
recognition. But I rather think this memorial page is not a good idea.
If the IETF is around long enough, eventually all members of the
community will die. (Unless medical science makes some amazing
achievements, I suppose...)
Good idea, but suggest to go wider than your a-d and stick to:
> anyone who was "part
> of the IETF community".
In practice, that will mean, anyone who someone else thinks was a part of the
community.
It would not be seemly to squabble about whether someone had really played a
significant part in
I am very supportive of this idea.
Russ
On Oct 21, 2012, at 12:31 PM, Dave Crocker wrote:
> Folks,
>
> A thread on the nanog list, about abha ahuja, reminds me of a suggestion I
> made casually to a few folk after the last IETF meeting:
>
> We should consider having a persistent IETF pag
Folks,
A thread on the nanog list, about abha ahuja, reminds me of a suggestion
I made casually to a few folk after the last IETF meeting:
We should consider having a persistent IETF page in memory of
people who were part of our community.
While the idea is simple, the comments I got b
10 matches
Mail list logo
