On 26/04/2013, at 9:38 PM, Alessandro Vesely ves...@tana.it wrote:
Injecting DRM through EME is a disservice to web standardization,
since the latter is supposed to foster the Internet revolution.
What does that *mean*? I'm wary of waving around banners like the
Internet revolution, since
On Fri 26/Apr/2013 21:59:52 +0200 Brian E Carpenter wrote:
3. EME should have a very low or zero cost of entry for a content provider.
Quoting from a commenter on The Register:
The DRM mechanism must allow *individuals* (or small groups) a
low-cost low-hassle way to use it. That's because
--On Friday, April 26, 2013 12:47 -0700 SM s...@resistor.net
wrote:
...
I think you are right. Of course, individuals pushing drafts
to the ISE could do
the same thing, but that is probably out of scope for us.
The ISE could even point to your document as useful advice for
individuals
On 27/04/2013 20:02, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
A DRM add-on that individuals or small groups use to protect their
stuff seems to be a chimera.
Has anybody tried to design one?
Brian
At 13:07 16-04-2013, The IESG wrote:
The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider
the following document:
- 'Instant Messaging and Presence Purpose for the Call-Info Header Field
in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)'
draft-saintandre-impp-call-info-02.txt as
