I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you
may receive.
Document: draft-ietf-netmod-interfaces-cfg-10
Hi
Thanks for your input, and I comment on your post that it is always
important to listen to reviews, and try to understand reviewers (even
if they may be stupid, or have wrong comments), any world/community
editor or author should be careful to listen and understand to
comments, to make their
Hi Fred,
I'm in complete agreement with you, but... :-)
Before investing in a common set of tools to archive implementation information,
I wanted to see whether there was *any* intention to make that information
available.
Thus, this is a baby-step towards the end result that you and I wold
Hi AB,
Thanks for your review.
IMHO, we should not request to delete this proposed
section, but it can be shifted to the Appendix section when published.
Removing the section is like doing some work in IETF and then
destroying it, future reviewers/implementers may not know why it was
Martin,
Thanks for the response. I am OK with your responses to the nits.
As for the comment on location I think I understand but what got me thinking
was the examples.
In E.1
An operator can configure a new interface by sending an edit-config
containing:
interface nc:operation=create
--On Sunday, April 28, 2013 12:22 +0100 Adrian Farrel
adr...@olddog.co.uk wrote:
Hi John,
Seems consistent with what is in the I-D at the moment. See
section 3.
Thus, those who want to record the info in the I-D can do
that, while those who want to go straight to a wiki can do
that
Hi Dave,
Thank you for your thorough review. While I accept many of your
comments, I must say I disagree with you on a few points, which together
go to the core of our motivation in writing this document. Thank you for
helping me clarify these points to myself :-)
- Our goal is much *less*
On 4/28/2013 8:03 AM, Yaron Sheffer wrote:
Hi Dave,
Thank you for your thorough review. While I accept many of your
comments, I must say I disagree with you on a few points, which together
go to the core of our motivation in writing this document. Thank you for
helping me clarify these points
Hi Tom,
On Apr 19, 2013, at 6:03 AM, t.p. daedu...@btconnect.com wrote:
If we required the IETF to reflect the diversity of people who are,
e.g., IT network professionals, then the IETF would fall apart for lack
of ability.
[…]
If the ADs of the IETF have to represent the diversity of the
On 04/29/2013 07:53 AM, Margaret Wasserman wrote:
Hi Tom,
On Apr 19, 2013, at 6:03 AM, t.p. daedu...@btconnect.com wrote:
If we required the IETF to reflect the diversity of people who
are, e.g., IT network professionals, then the IETF would fall apart
for lack of ability.
[…]
If the
The Patently-O blog has a new guest post by Jorge Contreras, who among
other things is the IETF's lawyer, on a recent court decision about
how to determine what's an appropriate RAND royalty rate for
standard-essential patents. The patents and standards in question
aren't from the IETF (they're
At 08:53 PM 4/28/2013, Margaret Wasserman wrote:
The question that people are asking is why the diversity of the IETF
leadership doesn't reflect the diversity of _the IETF_.
Let's consider for a moment that this may not actually be the correct question.
Instead, consider Why the diversity
Hi -
From: Michael Richardson mcr+i...@sandelman.ca
To: ietf ietf@ietf.org; Andrew McGregor andrewm...@gmail.com
Cc: Christian Huitema huit...@microsoft.com; SM s...@resistor.net
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2013 5:47 AM
Subject: Re: last call comments for
On 4/28/13, Yaron Sheffer yaronf.i...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Dave,
Thank you for your thorough review. While I accept many of your
comments, I must say I disagree with you on a few points, which together
go to the core of our motivation in writing this document. Thank you for
helping me clarify
On 4/28/2013 9:05 PM, Michael StJohns wrote:
Let's consider for a moment that this may not actually be the correct question. Instead,
consider Why the diversity of the IETF leadership doesn't reflect the diversity of
the set of the IETF WG chairs? I believe this is a more representative
Except that the IESG members select the wg chairs, which makes your baseline
stastistic suspect; it's too easy for all sorts of biasing factors to sway the
allocation of wg chair positions.
Mike actually mentioned that. Let's assume a simplified curriculum of
participant - author/editor - WG
On 4/28/2013 10:52 PM, Christian Huitema wrote:
Except that the IESG members select the wg chairs, which makes your
baseline stastistic suspect; it's too easy for all sorts of biasing
factors to sway the allocation of wg chair positions.
Mike actually mentioned that. Let's assume a simplified
17 matches
Mail list logo
