+1
I think SHOULD and RECOMMENDED should both be used when there is a strong
suggestion that implementations comply with the following statement unless
there are reasons not to.
Where I think it is time to go beyond 2119 is that we can distinguish two
circumstances:
SHOULD is the preferred term
In English as it is commonly spoken "recommended," and "should" do
indeed mean different things. Arguably it's unfortunate that 2119
conflated them, but that's the landscape we're living in.
So if the question is, "How do we improve the normative language in
RFCs?" we should probably be thinki
hi Ben. comment inline.
> From: Ben Campbell [mailto:b...@nostrum.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2013 1:04 PM
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> Thanks for the continued responses. A few more comments inline. I deleted
> sections that did not seem
> to need further comment. In summary, all of my concerns ar
Hi Michael,
Thanks for the continued responses. A few more comments inline. I deleted
sections that did not seem to need further comment. In summary, all of my
concerns are resolved except for the crypto profile question.
Thanks!
Ben.
On Jun 26, 2013, at 2:00 PM, Michael Thornburgh wrote:
[
comments inline.
> From: Ben Campbell [mailto:b...@nostrum.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2013 4:10 PM
>
> Thanks for the response! Comments inline:
>
> Thanks!
>
> Ben.
>
> On Jun 21, 2013, at 4:35 PM, Michael Thornburgh wrote:
>
> > hi Ben. thanks for your review. comments/replies in
On 26/06/2013 16:18, Pete Resnick wrote:
On 4/1/13 4:41 PM, Robert Sparks wrote:
On 3/28/13 1:17 PM, SM wrote:
At 05:13 28-03-2013, Burger Eric wrote:
I use the IMAP interface once, mark a bunch of things as read, and
then decide never to use the IMAP interface ever again. How long
does the s
On 4/1/13 4:41 PM, Robert Sparks wrote:
On 3/28/13 1:17 PM, SM wrote:
At 05:13 28-03-2013, Burger Eric wrote:
I use the IMAP interface once, mark a bunch of things as read, and
then decide never to use the IMAP interface ever again. How long
does the server need to keep my (per-user) marking m
Original Message -
From: "Brian E Carpenter"
To: "t.p."
Cc: "ietf" ;
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2013 9:26 PM
> Tom,
>
> On 25/06/2013 22:48, t.p. wrote:
> ...
> > The main impression that this page has on me is that this is a part
of
> > the IETF,
>
> Yes. It is a committee set up by the I
