RE: Comments For I-D: draft-moonesamy-nomcom-eligibility-00 (was Re: The Nominating Committee Process: Eligibility)

2013-06-29 Thread Adrian Farrel
This message is reply to an author of a new draft under ietf discussion. If this list is not the correct place to discuss such matter, then the list's responsible Chair is required to give details of where to discuss such new work. I have no idea what a list's responsible chair is, but there

RE: Comments For I-D: draft-moonesamy-nomcom-eligibility-00 (was Re: The Nominating Committee Process: Eligibility)

2013-06-29 Thread Noel Chiappa
From: Adrian Farrel adr...@olddog.co.uk told not to post is, AFAIK only achievable through a posting ban, which you don't seem to have received. Yet. Noel

RE: Comments For I-D: draft-moonesamy-nomcom-eligibility-00 (was Re: The Nominating Committee Process: Eligibility)

2013-06-29 Thread Noel Chiappa
From: j...@mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Noel Chiappa) Yet. PS: I probably should have added a :-) to that. Sorry, it's early, the brain's not firing on all cylinders yet, and I was so entranced by the chance to set the record for the shortest ever IETF list e-mail... :-) Noel

Re: Comments For I-D: draft-moonesamy-nomcom-eligibility-00 (was Re: The Nominating Committee Process: Eligibility)

2013-06-29 Thread Doug Barton
On 06/29/2013 05:28 AM, Noel Chiappa wrote: From: j...@mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Noel Chiappa) Yet. PS: I probably should have added a :-) to that. Sorry, it's early, the brain's not firing on all cylinders yet, and I was so entranced by the chance to set the record for the shortest

Re: Comments For I-D: draft-moonesamy-nomcom-eligibility-00 (was Re: The Nominating Committee Process: Eligibility)

2013-06-29 Thread John Levine
In article 51cf38eb.3080...@dougbarton.us you write: On 06/29/2013 05:28 AM, Noel Chiappa wrote: From: j...@mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Noel Chiappa) Yet. PS: I probably should have added a :-) to that. Sorry, it's early, the brain's not firing on all cylinders yet, and I was so

Re: Comments For I-D: draft-moonesamy-nomcom-eligibility-00 (was Re: The Nominating Committee Process: Eligibility)

2013-06-29 Thread Michael StJohns
The shortest ietf email was sent at least 20 years ago, consisted of a single ! as the body. Of course the subject went on for two lines. I forget what the subject was. Mike Sent from my iPad On Jun 29, 2013, at 15:43, Doug Barton do...@dougbarton.us wrote: On 06/29/2013 05:28 AM, Noel

Re: Evi Nemeth

2013-06-29 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Further bad news: no sighting and no debris after considerable searching. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-23110736 Regards Brian Carpenter On 28/06/2013 11:24, Brian E Carpenter wrote: Evi used to be an IETF regular. There is rather ominous news - she is lost at sea between New

Re: RFC 6234 code

2013-06-29 Thread John C Klensin
--On Friday, June 28, 2013 16:41 -0400 Joe Abley jab...@hopcount.ca wrote: If you really think you see a legal difference in doing the second, fine; I propose that you are just searching for problems that do not exist. Quite possibly they don't, and I'm not presuming to talk for John.

RE: Comments For I-D: draft-moonesamy-nomcom-eligibility-00 (was Re: The Nominating Committee Process: Eligibility)

2013-06-29 Thread l.wood
-1 Lloyd Wood http://sat-net.com/L.Wood/ From: ietf-boun...@ietf.org [ietf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Noel Chiappa [j...@mercury.lcs.mit.edu] Sent: 29 June 2013 13:28 To: ietf@ietf.org Cc: j...@mercury.lcs.mit.edu Subject: RE: Comments For I-D: