On 11/8/10 10:57 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
On 2010-11-08 15:26, The IESG wrote:
First, schedule all BOFs for Monday afternoon.
Hmm. How many non-overlapping time slots? It would be extremely
frustrating if there was a lot of overlap between BOFs. Some of us
are interested in almost any
Just a reminder that there's a relatively new list for discussing topics
relating to the IRTF, including proposals for new research groups, at
https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/irtf-discuss .
--aaron
IRTF Chair
___
Ietf mailing list
On 7/30/10 9:46 AM, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
On Jul 30, 2010, at 3:11 AM, Mary Barnes wrote:
Just to add my two cents to this discussion from a (past) noncom chair
perpsective, having more experienced IETF participants on the Nomcom helps
tremendously. It makes it far easier for the
Hi Donald-
You present an interesting idea and I appreciate your desire to avoid a
two-class nomcom. If you were to take that approach, I'd suggest allocating
points as below:
High points (e.g., 10)
- served as a working group chair
- served on the IESG or IAB
Medium points (e.g., 5)
-
A new IRTF research group on virtual networks has been created. Charter
included below.
--aaron
IRTF Chair
---
Virtual Networks Research Group (VNRG)
Chairs
Joe Touch to...@isi.edu mailto:to...@isi.edu
Martin Stiemerling
Forwarding on behalf of the organizers.
--
Aaron Falk
Chair
Internet Research Task Force
http://www.irtf.org
We are pleased to announce an upcoming NetFPGA tutorial co-located with
IETF in Anaheim, CA on March 21, 2010.
An open platform called
Of possible interest to this list.
--aaron
Original Message
Subject:[IMRG] ICSI Netalyzr measurement project
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 07:54:08 -0800
From: v...@ee.lbl.gov
To: i...@ietf.org
CC: Christian Kreibich christ...@icir.org, Nicholas C. Weaver
clarified (say
to include planned standards work or some such).
--aaron
--
Aaron Falk
Chair
Internet Research Task Force
http://www.irtf.org
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
.)
regards,
--aaron
---
Aaron Falk
Chair
Internet Research Task Force
http://www.irtf.org
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
--On November 10, 2005 8:11:33 AM -0800 Dave Crocker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
It seems to me that it
might be more productive to, e.g., cut the current
morning slot to two hours and insert an hour slot in the
morning.
yes.
Ditto.
Maybe we need to ask Ray and
Am I the only one dissatisfied with the meeting schedule? I find that the
run of meetings from 1300 to 1930 is just too long, especially the four
hour period from 1300 - 1710. I would strongly prefer our 'traditional'
schedule over the current one.
Even if I can't know which continent I'll
I seem to have left a small wireless mouse somewhere, probably the terminal
room. Has anybody seen it?
--aaron
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
My wife is here with our girls (ages 3, 9) and is interested in hooking up
with other families with kids. We've scoped out some nice parks, etc, over
the last week. Drop me a private email if interested.
--aaron
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
--On July 24, 2005 12:57:02 AM -0700 Dave Crocker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is quite a bit of publicity about pickpockets around Paris
generally, and especially in Metro stations. In the Versailles chateau,
they make regular public-address announcements about it.
Indeed. Yesterday my
--On May 1, 2005 9:04:12 AM -0700 Dave Crocker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
in general I think the issue is stricter meeting planning and
management, where the goals and process are more explicit.
Sorry for coming very late to this discussion.
I might suggest scheduling a (preferably voice)
Dave Crocker wrote:
Ole May I suggest that we consider starting a working group on this:
iRtf, perhaps, but not iEtf, yet. It's still in the research phase.
Hmm. Dave, are you suggesting a research group on wheel-reinvention
protocols? Or perhaps, snail-paced transport?
--aaron
Bill Sommerfeld wrote:
Stateful DHCP lease tracking was clearly causing more trouble than
it's worth to the IETF network.
Ya' know, I'd be happy if I received a static IP address with my
meeting registration confirmation. I'd even be happy to supply my
wireless MAC address...
--aaron
Carsten Bormann wrote:
(The best WG meeting I ever attended was one where Tony Li hammered
out most of the IP-over-firewire details in one session by asking
the attending firewire experts all the right questions in one
sitting. I'm still wowed for life. But you can't do this for
something
List sure it quiet. I wonder if it's broken? If you receive this,
please don't respond. Please.
--aaron
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
(bcc'ing the secretariat to generate a trouble ticket)
I'd like to request a stable (from meeting to meeting) email address
and web page for network operations at IETF meetings.
Thanks,
--aaron
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
FYI, I have just set up chatrooms at ietf.xmpp.org for all the BOFs
which are currently listed on the IETF 62 agenda page:
Peter-
Many thanks! Can you confirm that users will be able to set the
Subject: in the chatrooms? On teleconferences I've found that very
useful
Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:
Margarets rev 01 drafts, in Section 1, 3rd para starts:
The IETF Administrative Support Activity (IASA) provides the
administrative structure required to support the IETF standards
process and to support the technical activities of the IETF,
This hotel is in walking distance of some of the best Ethiopian
cuisine you'll find in the US. If you have never tried Ethiopian
cuisine and are feeling adventurous, I can highly recommend two
restaurants:
Faskika's
2447 18th Street
http://www.fasikas.com
Roha
1212 U Street
I'd like to suggest that this thread move to the internet-history
list.
(For those unfamiliar with this list, information is available at
http://www.postel.org/internet-history.htm)
--aaron
___
Ietf mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Ietf mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
John-
Thanks for your note. A good reset of the discussion, IMO. Some
chiming in and a question below...
On Sep 14, 2004, at 2:12 PM, John C Klensin wrote:
We have
exactly two problems:
(1) For a number of policy and budgetary reasons, having two
revenue sources that have to be
Erik-
Just curious: do you see draft-klensin-ip-service-terms-04.txt as a
useful contribution to this effort? My understanding is that the it is
motivated to be helpful input to the task you describe.
--aaron
On Sep 8, 2004, at 5:14 AM, Erik Huizer wrote:
My government has concluded after
On Sep 5, 2004, at 4:15 PM, Sam Hartman wrote:
I do not think that recommendation 7 in scenario B is a good idea. I
believe that plenary time is full enough without crowding it more.
What about a 'business meeting' that is scheduled in wg slot or even on
Sunday?
I understand that there may be
On Sep 3, 2004, at 3:06 PM, Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:
If we were to go for option C, then in my personal view, it would have
the
serious benefit that we are ALWAYS (from day 1) responsible to make
sure
things work well. And we need to re-negotiate every so often if we want
to keep the
On Jul 22, 2004, at 6:30 AM, Michael Richardson wrote:
I think it comes back to:
a) some groups probably shouldn't meet as often
b) some groups perhaps shouldn't exist at all
c) some groups need 6-10 hours of continuous face-time in which
they
can actually get things done. We
://ietf.levkowetz.com/survey/attendance/
--aaron (for Aaron Falk, Henrik Levkowetz, and Mark Allman)
PS. Please don't complain about the questions. If you have better,
feel free to build your own -- more data is good! :)
___
Ietf mailing list
[EMAIL
On May 27, 2004, at 1:19 PM, Michael Richardson wrote:
May I suggest that a URL like:
http://www.ietf.org/std/std0051.txt
be made that can refer to the STD series of documents?
Not sure what's motivating your suggestion. However, here's one that
works:
Woohyong-
Thank you for such a well-run network!
One question: do you know if the free wireless in the rooms (essid:
lottehotel) will continue after the IETF network teardown?
--aaron
On Mar 4, 2004, at 4:43 PM, Woohyong Choi wrote:
Seoul meeting participants,
We'll begin tearing down gears
smtp.ietf59.or.kr won't accept mail from the wireless access in the
hotel rooms. Not sure what the address block is but it would be nice
to have.
Keep up the good work.
--aaron
What's dris? Not on the IETF agenda.
--aaron
On Mar 1, 2004, at 2:01 PM, Melinda Shore wrote:
I realize that the DRIS BOF was put together somewhat quickly, but
the mailing list situation is a little frustrating.
1) there's no mailing list archive at the URL given on the agenda
2) there are no
On Feb 26, 2004, at 2:15 AM, Joe Abley wrote:
Also, for GSM subscribers:
http://www.etechkorea.info/articles/20020601001.php
These are CDMA phones which are specially designed for GSM roamers
(you stick your GSM SIM in the back of them). I used a KTF CDMA phone
with my Microcell GSM SIM
On Jan 29, 2004, at 9:47 AM, John Stracke wrote:
It sounds like you might be safest contacting the Korean embassy
yourself and asking for a visa. If they say you don't need one,
you're on firmer ground than if the IETF says you don't need one.
I believe the risk is in how one characterizes
-in the Austria Center?
-in the Crowne Plaza?
Inquiring minds want to know.
--aaron
Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
PMTUD was approved as a WG yesterday, so it's probably Probably a WG or
Proto-WG.
Proto was my first guess, too. However, I've changed my mind and
now think it's pending.
Interestingly, I received a some private responses indicating other
folks didn't know
Appears twice in http://www.ietf.org/meetings/agenda_57.html (pmtud
lemonade).
--aaron
Margaret Wasserman wrote:
We could attempt to increase fundraising for ISOC/the IETF.
Good idea. I suggest a bakesale. Everyone bring a baked good to
Vienna...
Marshall-
Is there a way to browse available IETF jabber conferences?
--aaron
Tom Marshall wrote:
I have found that IPv6 seems to have a much longer round trip delay than
IPv4 for just about every site that I have tried. For example, pinging
www.rfc-editor.org from here gives me this:
IPv6: rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 589.174/678.001/1109.953/117.776 ms
IPv4:
Is anybody else noticing this?
--aaron
=
C:\Documents and Settings\falktracert6 dns.postel.org
Tracing route to dns.postel.org [3ffe:801:1000:0:2d0:b7ff:c0de:1]
from 2001:460:410:8128:61ba:b359:9d3a:1f81 over a maximum of 30 hops:
12 ms 4
Well done, Harald! I applaud this move towards 'transparency.'
One question. In the sentence on the finance page where you wrote:
In the US, this is one way in which hotels recover the cost of
meeting rooms; in one recent query, the secretariat got a quote on
meeting rooms without
I've only heard secondhand about the activities in the sub-ip area and
so I can't offer direct feedback. However, in
http://www.ietf.org//mail-archive/ietf/Current/msg18130.html, John
Klensin makes the following point:
(4) There is a class of WG for which the bounded outcome model
will,
Robert Elz wrote:
And a request - could the system be extended, sometime, so that it could
send e-mail to the working group, where there is one, or the (first) author
in other cases, when a doc changes state?
That would avoid the need for continually polling the web page every day
to find
Craig Simon wrote:
I've got a lot of information on this which I'd be happy to share and
exchange, but I still need and want more details. I'm not sure the IETF
list is the best place to discuss this matter, however, and if anyone
can suggest an alternative site, I'd gladly participate
--On Thursday, March 21, 2002 10:54:05 AM -0800 Ole J. Jacobsen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Meanwhile, please mark your calendar for:
1. Akihabara (electronics town) Geek Tour, Sunday July 14. On Sundays, the
Main Drag aka Chuo Dori is closed to cars and Akihabara will be full of
people
On Tue, 2002-04-16 at 08:14, Dave Crocker wrote:
That other working group is already being not served. Holding a working
group to its milestones makes the situation more explicit.
Query to the group: If we believe we should not hold working groups to
their milestones, why bother to
On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 08:23:15AM -0800, Tony Hain wrote:
My question was directed at Noel's assertion that security requires a
site border router as the implementation. Just because that may be
cheaper than fixing all the current hosts, wouldn't we be better off in
the long run if all
--On Thursday, January 17, 2002 07:03:21 PM -0500 Ran Atkinson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Doing something on Sunday might create more options. Quite separately,
it was true in the past that IETF would have one or more morning plenary
meetings (which could be attempted again).
-
On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 07:44:49PM -0500, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 03:05:24PM -0500, Gene Hastings wrote:
Using NAT to connect several of your own computers is one thing.
Using it to connect your neighbors and buddies is quite another. Many
ISP agreements have
On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 11:23:06AM -0700, Paul Hoffman / IMC wrote:
The advantage of multicast vs. tape-and-archive is the real-time
aspect for the viewer. However, this is rarely, rarely used. If it
turns out that switching from multicast to tape-and-archive can get
more camera operators in
54 matches
Mail list logo
