I LOVE this one.
Bert
On 7/20/11 8:23 AM, Yoav Nir wrote:
Hi
Very appropriate for XKCD to post this just a few days before an IETF
meeting.
http://www.xkcd.com/927/
(For those who are not familiar with XKCD, don't miss the alt-text on the
picture)
Yoav
I have a Business service from my ISP too. They told me that somewhere in
2012 they would look into IPv6.
So I have threatened to move to another provider. But we do not have much
choice in NL at the moment
I believe. Although I have to re-checked recently.
Bert
On 6/10/11 3:04 PM, Thomas
On 3/30/11 1:21 PM, Olaf Kolkman wrote:
Dear Colleagues,
I have just chartered a very short draft that intends to update BCP101. It can
be found at:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kolkman-iasa-ex-officio-membership
The draft is very short and contains only a few sentences of substance:
Revision 9 is out and tried to address IETF LC comments
Here is the diff between the rev you reviewed and the latest one:
http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-netconf-4741bis-07url2=draft-ietf-netconf-4741bis-09
Bert
document shepherd
On 2/8/11 3:05 AM, Tina Tsou wrote:
I have
I was appointed to review this document from an OPS-DIR point of
vie, i,e, to check for operational or management aspects.
This are is not my space of expertise, so don't rely too much on my
report.
I think that there might be some operational aspects in the sense that
sometimes
Although I do sort of also agree with Scott, I think it is one step in the right
direction. So please seen a sponsor and get it published.
Bert
On 10/26/10 4:48 AM, Scott O. Bradner wrote:
I'd like to hear from the community about pushing forward with this
proposal or dropping it
I do not
+1
Bert
Brian E Carpenter wrote:
On 2010-03-11 13:09, David Kessens wrote:
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 03:42:12PM -0800, Dave CROCKER wrote:
The prudent action is to return it to the appellant, stating that it
cannot be processed until it has been made clear and concise.
I fully
Stephen,
I think it is your first bullet point. We have not standardize it yet.
And so it is implementation dependent as to what authorization is used.
Bert
Stephen Hanna wrote:
Tom,
Thanks for responding to my comments. Allow me to respond.
You wrote:
As a participant in netconf, I
