Randy Bush wrote:
What I am saying is that if we that we want our leaders to only
moderate discussion we are in a big problem.
we are in a big problem, and this is one major part. two decades of
lack of coherent architectural oversight is another symptom of this.
i'm surprised that we
On 29 Oct 2005, at 20:15, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Brian E Carpenter writes: Steve, I'm not suggesting that technologists should duck responsibility.But I really think there are better fora. In fact, that's one of thereasons I've always supported the ISOC in its wider
which helped
bridge some communication gaps.
This type of awareness activity is well worth doing particularly when
IETF meets outside its usual stomping grounds.
Christian
Christian de Larrinaga
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1
addressed by DNS.
But generally ideas along these lines that I've seen tend to
piggyback with or around the DNS rather than replace it. -
Christian de Larrinaga
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 30 Sep 2005, at 22:15, Michael Mealling wrote:
Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED
://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb
Dear Steven,
the Public-Root is not an alternative root but a solution.
Kind regards,
Peter and Karin
not for everyone it isn't!
unless you think the solution is to sow confusion.
Christian de Larrinaga
Network Brokers Ltd
to go now.
thanks
Christian
-Original Message-
From: Peter Ford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 22 November 2004 07:30
To: Christian de Larrinaga; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: How the IPnG effort was started
Run a market survey and you will find out why people buy these NAT devices
if they are not.
Christian
Christian de Larrinaga
t:+44-(0)844-484-9197
m:+44(0)7989-386778
--
Network Brokers Ltd
___
Ietf mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
scott bradner wrote: 10 October 2004 21:39
small quotes are fine (under fair use) but significant excerpts are not
(under normal copyright law and under the copyright notices on IETF RFCs)
Scott
Well I've just reached to the shelf behind me for a book that some well
meaning (but possibly
a past chair of a chapter.
Christian de Larrinaga
Network Brokers Ltd
p.s., A few inline thoughts included below.
From Leslie Daigle
Not an Internet-Draft L. Daigle
VeriSign
How about prior art? Am I wrong to think of expiry dates as only relating to
currency to Standards process rather than to the broader record?
Following on from that does the expiry indicate that the copyright reverts
back from ISOC to the authors? I hadn't expected that to be the case.
Christian
scott bradner 10 September 2004 15:34
Following on from that does the expiry indicate that the
copyright reverts
back from ISOC to the authors? I hadn't expected that to be the case.
note that the only rights that the ISOC has for IDs is to publish
them and to make derivative works
, please speak up - Carl has the
pen ready
Yes that would be helpful.
Christian
Christian de Larrinaga
tel:+44-844-484-9197
m:+44-7989-386778
--
Deploying Internet services?
You need to participate in the UK IPv6 Deployment
Christian de Larrinaga
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Ole Jacobsen
Sent: 20 June 2004 23:52
To: Hadmut Danisch
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: What exactly is an internet (service) provider?
If by IPSec you mean what the marketing folks
a retribution service?
Christian de Larrinaga
___
Ietf mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
)
Bob
you mean that current telecoms regulations are passed their sell by date
anyway and serve as trade protectionism for a fast reducing minority of
vested interests?
Christian
Christian de Larrinaga
Network Brokers Ltd
+44-7989-386778
Lin Zhi-Wei
You mention a UK national position paper. Can you give me the references and
what made this national?
many thanks,
Christian de Larrinaga
A clear U.K. national position paper was
contributed to the meeting currently underway
(delayed contribution 483), supporting that all
three
16 matches
Mail list logo
