Hi Arturo,
Good points that you have made. However, I would like to just sharpen some
of the things. There are many governments that do not understand how the
Internet works. Well, there are a lot of people even in the IETF that
might not really know how Internet works, and even bigger number
Hi,
I think very strongly that IAB should sign this document.
Cheers,
Jonne.
--
Jonne Soininen
Renesas Mobile
Tel: +358 40 527 4634
E-mail: jonne.soini...@renesasmobile.com
On 8/11/12 1:55 AM, Bob Hinden bob.hin...@gmail.com wrote:
I support the IETF and IAB chairs signing document.
Hello everybody,
The beer and gear seems to work pretty well at Nanog, and therefore it is
a good idea to consider it for the IETF. However, I am a bit worried that
we are, however, not seeing the difference between the IETF and Nanog.
Nanog is a Network Operator Group. Hence, the name. Vendors
Hi Brian,
On 9/21/11 12:09 AM, Brian E Carpenter brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com
wrote:
[snip]
The Trust would need to commit to allowing these advisors to join their
meetings too. But that can be done in other ways than the Trust
Agreement.
(so yes, I agree with this line of thought)
Hi Olaf,
I went through the draft just now, and I have some quite strong feelings
about it. I'm sorry I'm sending my comments so late in the game.
A disclaimer first: I was the chairman of the IAOC some years back, but I
haven't been actively involved with IETF administration after that.
Hi Jari,
On 9/19/11 9:36 PM, Jari Arkko jari.ar...@piuha.net wrote:
Jonne,
First, I want to thank you for the clear expression in Finnish. (Maheeta!
Vaikka näiden muutosten läpivienti alkaa kyllä tuntua siltä kuin jäitä
polttelisi, saa odottaa perse ruvella että kukaan olisi samaa mieltä
