On 1/14/13 1:18 PM, David Conrad d...@virtualized.org wrote:
John,
Just to be clear:
On Jan 14, 2013, at 7:19 AM, John C Klensin john-i...@jck.com wrote:
On those general subjects -- that trying to open the question of
2050 is a rat hole and that we should not go down it, we
completely
-Original Message-
From: ietf-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Keith Moore
Years ago, my impression was that that Sunday training sessions were
pretty much ignored
by anyone experienced in the organization. Is this still the case?
I've been to the
-Original Message-
From: ietf-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Barry Leiba
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 10:12 AM
To: IETF discussion list
Subject: Re: Barely literate minutes
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 5:56 PM, Pete Resnick presn...@qti.qualcomm.com
-Original Message-
From: ietf-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Dave Cridland
Consider:
An octet may contain 0-255.
An octet contains 0-255.
An octet might contain 0-255 - or it might not?
The Foo octet MUST lie between 0 and 127 inclusive; that is,
-Original Message-
From: ietf-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Doug Barton
Step 1: Determine the most popular inside prefixes for CPEs
Step 2: Use the least popular RFC 1918 prefix for the CGN network
Step 3: If your customer has somehow chosen the
-Original Message-
From: ietf-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Doug Barton
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 7:00 PM
To: Chris Grundemann
Cc: IESG IESG; IETF Discussion
Subject: Re: Consensus Call: draft-weil-shared-transition-space-request
On
