On Sep 17, 2013, at 6:36 PM, Steve Crocker st...@shinkuro.com wrote:
I'm in agreement.
We have not had any standards so far regarding maintenance of the validity of
contact information. For example, my contact information for the April 1,
1995 RFC 1776 is:
Steve Crocker
CyberCash,
On Sep 17, 2013, at 7:48 PM, Scott Brim scott.b...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Michael Tuexen
michael.tue...@lurchi.franken.de wrote:
I was always wondering the authors can't get an @ietf.org address, which is
listed
in the RFC and is used to forward e-mail to another
On Sep 17, 2013, at 8:19 PM, Melinda Shore melinda.sh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 9/17/13 9:55 AM, Michael Tuexen wrote:
... and that is my point. One level of indirection might be useful here.
I would prefer to update only one mapping and not go through a list
of RFCs and change the mapping
On Sep 17, 2013, at 9:24 PM, Melinda Shore melinda.sh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 9/17/13 11:14 AM, Michael Tuexen wrote:
For example
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3237.txt
has 7 authors. I know that at least 4 affiliations have changed
and at least you can't reach me anymore via the given e-mail
On Jun 28, 2013, at 6:54 PM, Hannes Tschofenig hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
[I posted this question a little while ago to the WG chairs mailing list and
got no response.
Maybe my question is too trivial but I thought I should try it on
On Jun 28, 2013, at 7:14 PM, Hannes Tschofenig hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
For SCTP we did a number of interoperability tests, which were
face to face meetings and the people who were developing stacks
we there. This events were always
On Feb 26, 2013, at 8:01 PM, Dale R. Worley wrote:
From: James Polk jmp...@cisco.com
It used to be 5 PM Pacific, now it's 24:00 UTC.
It's always been 2400 UTC, but with all the daylight savings time
adjustments from country to country changing from year to year, I
have talked to the
On Feb 25, 2013, at 8:10 AM, Marc Petit-Huguenin wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 02/24/2013 11:02 PM, Martin Sustrik wrote:
On 25/02/13 07:56, Arturo Servin wrote:
If it were to collaborate, an ietf application with open standards should
be the way forward.
On Aug 11, 2012, at 8:10 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
On Aug 11, 2012, at 5:05 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
The IETF Chair and the IAB Chair intend to sign the Affirmation
of the Modern Global Standards Paradigm, which can be found
here:
Hi Lars,
comment in-line.
Best regards
Michael
On Sep 17, 2007, at 12:11 PM, Lars Eggert wrote:
On 2007-9-17, at 12:13, ext Fred Baker wrote:
Dumb question of the month. With the exception of the last claim
(...can prioritize...), this could just as easily describe SCTP.
What here is
On Jul 9, 2007, at 7:53 AM, Lars Eggert wrote:
On 2007-7-5, at 19:07, ext Tom.Petch wrote:
If we had a range of transports (perhaps like OSI offered), we
could choose the
one most suited. We don't, we only have two, so it may become a
choice of one
with a hack. But then that limited
Result from a node in Germany:
traceroute6 to www.ietf.org (2610:a0:c779:b::d1ad:35b4) from
2002:508f:ffec::217:f2ff:fec4:7979, 30 hops max, 12 byte packets
1 2002:508f:ffec::216:cbff:fec3:6b1a 0.804 ms 0.481 ms 0.432 ms
2 * 2002:5042:8003::1 70.834 ms *
3 2001:440::ffe4::2
I tried, but got
There is a problem with the page you are trying to reach and it
cannot be displayed.
Please try the following:
Click the Refresh button, or try again later.
Open the www.surveymonkey.com home page, and then look for links to
the information you want.
HTTP 500.100 -
13 matches
Mail list logo
