[ Please distribute this article as widely as possible, wherever appropriate. ]
The Free Protocols Foundation article
Position Statement regarding the
RIM Mobile E-Mail Patent Assertion
is provided as an attachment in Plain Text format.
The article states the position of the Free
Did you follow the discussions that I initiated on
a similar set of topics on the [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailing lists about two years ago?
In that thread I proposed something along the
lines that you are looking for. I am including my
last message on that thread below.
Bob Allisat [EMAIL
On Fri, 12 Jan 2001 13:25:09 -0500, "Hung Pham" [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Fri, 12 Jan 2001 20:25:39 + (GMT), Lloyd Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
Hung Hello;
Hung I'm interested in the "TCP for Transaction or T/TCP" protocol,
Hung basically this protocol collapses the TCP three way
All of this and a great deal more is discussed in various old books,
such as:
- Internetwork Mobility - The CDPD Approach
Taylor, Waung and Banan
Prentice Hall
1996
ISBN: 0-13-209693-5
Hope this helps.
...Mohsen
On Wed, 18 Oct 2000 23:04:39 -0400, Keith Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 18 Sep 2000 01:55:21 -0700 (PDT), "James P. Salsman" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
Those who want to build good things and move forward fast, can evaluate
the merits of LEAP and participate in its evolution and enhancement.
The starting point URL is: http://www.leapforum.org/
On Mon, 26 Jun 2000 08:23:41 +0200, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Harald At 05:30 26.06.2000 +, Mohsen BANAN-Public wrote:
The current status, state and beginning date of that example
makes my point.
After 7 months of delay, caused by the IESG, ESRO
On Mon, 26 Jun 2000 08:04:34 +0200, Patrik =?iso-8859-1?Q?F=E4ltstr=F6m?=
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
After 7 months of delay, caused by the IESG, ESRO was published
as an RFC in Sept. 1997.
Patrik There have already been enough discussions on the IETF list about
Patrik ESRO. See the
In 1997, D.J. Bernstein wrote a short note titled:
RFC submission: a case study
The full text of that note is available at
http://cr.yp.to/proto/rfced.html
D.J. Bernstein concluded his case study with the following
paragraph.
It's well known that the IETF is no longer the
On Tue, 27 Jun 2000 15:48:50 GMT, Bob Braden [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Mohsen
Mohsen The Real component is that IETF/IESG/IAB is well on its way towards
Mohsen becoming a cult violating all published procedures. IETF/IESG/IAB now
Mohsen claims full ownership of the RFC Publication
On Sat, 24 Jun 2000 08:38:38 +0200, Patrik =?iso-8859-1?Q?F=E4ltstr=F6m?=
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Patrik At 00.31 + 00-06-24, Mohsen BANAN-Public wrote:
IETF/IESG/IAB folks keep saying TCP is good enough for everything.
Patrik We don't.
Patrik See for example SCTP described
On Wed, 21 Jun 2000 11:05:43 -0400, "Brijesh Kumar"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Brijesh PS: By the way, ReFLEX is perfectly fine for two way messaging
Brijesh applications.
Mohsen No.
Mohsen
Mohsen ReFLEX is not perfectly fine.
Mohsen
Mohsen It is not IP based.
Brijesh Hi
On Tue, 20 Jun 2000 19:02:39 +0100 (BST), Lloyd Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
Lloyd And from that anti-WAP polemic:
Mohsen We gratefully acknowledge the assistance of the
Mohsen following persons in the preparation and review of
Mohsen this document: Andrew Hammoude, Richard
On Wed, 21 Jun 2000 10:17:25 -0700 (PDT), "James P. Salsman" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
James The Free Protocols Foundation is correct in their position.
James The amount of misrepresentation in the industry is becoming
James absurd. Most of it is bait-and-switch, but beyond the
James
I request that you review the attached document and
email us your comments to:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is what I consider a reasonably complete
version of the policies and procedures which
is likely to bring a lot of good in the area of
Internet protocol development.
If the Free
On Tue, 20 Jun 2000 10:30:31 -0400, "Brijesh Kumar"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Brijesh It is an open secret that wireless industry is a closed cartel of
Brijesh three super heavyweights (Motorola, Ericsson, and Nokia) and two heavy
Brijesh weights (Lucent and Nortel). There is no role for
On Wed, 21 Jun 2000 04:59:15 +0859 (), Masataka Ohta
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
The Internet end-to-end model will once again prevail, putting the
cellular service providers back into their proper place as providers
of packet pipes, nothing more. And life will be good again. :-)
16 matches
Mail list logo
