I also feel that 3:2:2 is about the right ratio.
Actually, the correct ratio is pi:e:sqrt(2). Furthermore, one can prove
that, given enough IETFs, we can converge to this close enough that we'll be
within _everyone's_ error margin!
Robert
___
Ietf
On 2010.03.30. 11:41, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
I'll prepare information about all of this as soon as I know the
transition status during the IETF week. And in any event, there are no
early booking / online booking discounts for Dutch train tickets, and
buying online with Dutch Railways
On 2010.03.13. 19:23, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 05:13:41PM +0100,
Arnt Gulbrandsena...@gulbrandsen.priv.no wrote
a message of 17 lines which said:
Those are RFC 3339 dates.
It took thirteen messages for someone to notice that there is an IETF
standard for dates
The second attachment is a macro that can be used in the wiki to annotate the
dates, something like this:
[[Date(2010-01-02)]]
For example with a format of %a, %d %b %Y, the wiki will display this:
Fri, 01 Jan 2010
Uhm, does it work in .txt files? What about PDF-A? :-)
Robert
On 2010.03.13. 15:51, Cullen Jennings wrote:
I just got abused by someone reading the IESG web pages and pointing out
dates like 2010-01-02 , are confusing. Is there a better way to do dates
that we should be using on the ietf.org web pages?
IMO ISO8601 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_8601)
