Re: [netext] Last Call: draft-ietf-netext-update-notifications-07.txt (Update Notifications for Proxy Mobile IPv6) to Proposed Standard

2013-08-23 Thread Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)
Hi Carlos, Thanks for your review comments. Please see inline. On 8/22/13 6:28 PM, Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano c...@it.uc3m.es wrote: Hi, I've taken a look at the current version of the draft and I think it is in good shape. I have a couple of comments: - I think it might be useful to

Re: Last Call: draft-gundavelli-v6ops-pmipv6-address-reservations-00.txt (Reserved IPv6 Interface Identifier for Proxy Mobile IPv6) to Informational RFC

2011-09-22 Thread Sri Gundavelli
Hi Suresh, On 9/21/11 3:32 PM, Suresh Krishnan suresh.krish...@ericsson.com wrote: Hi Sri, On 11-09-19 01:29 PM, Sri Gundavelli wrote: Hi Jari: In case of PMIPv6, we need the interface ID allocation for PMIv6 domain-wide usage. We may not be able tie this to a specific EUI-64

Re: Last Call: draft-gundavelli-v6ops-pmipv6-address-reservations-00.txt (Reserved IPv6 Interface Identifier for Proxy Mobile IPv6) to Informational RFC

2011-09-20 Thread Sri Gundavelli
Hi Jari: In case of PMIPv6, we need the interface ID allocation for PMIv6 domain-wide usage. We may not be able tie this to a specific EUI-64 identifier derived from a MAC identifier of any individual MAG hosting this configuration. But, if your recommendation is to tie the IPv6 interface

RE: Gen-art review of draft-ietf-netlmm-proxymip6-11.txt

2008-03-11 Thread Sri Gundavelli
Hi Elwyn, The need for the L2 interface identifier (such as MAC address) is to predictably identify the interface of a mobile node. The Access Technology Type in combination with the interface identifier is used as the index field in the BCE. Looks like this is not implied. We can

RE: Gen-art review of draft-ietf-netlmm-proxymip6-11.txt

2008-03-06 Thread Sri Gundavelli
Hi Elwyn, Sorry for the late reply. Thanks for reviewing the updated draft. We will address the two remaining issues. Please see inline. -Original Message- From: Elwyn Davies [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 29, 2008 5:57 AM To: General Area Review Team Cc:

RE: Gen-art review of draft-ietf-netlmm-proxymip6-10.txt

2008-02-25 Thread Sri Gundavelli
Hi Elwyn, Thanks for the detailed review. Appreciate it. The latest draft that we published (-11) should address your comments. Please see inline. Regards Sri -Original Message- From: Elwyn Davies [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 18, 2008 3:11 PM To: General

Re: [netlmm] Last Call: draft-ietf-netlmm-proxymip6-10.txt to Proposed Standard

2008-02-21 Thread Sri Gundavelli
Hi Allison, Thanks for the review. Appreciate it. Please see inline. On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, Allison Mankin wrote: I've reviewed this document as part of the transport area directorate's ongoing effort to review key IETF documents. These comments were written primarily for the transport area

Re: Gen-art review of draft-ietf-netlmm-proxymip6-10.txt

2008-02-19 Thread Sri Gundavelli
Thanks Elwyn for the review. We will address each of these comments and will propose the text, some time this week. Regards Sri On Mon, 18 Feb 2008, Elwyn Davies wrote: I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please

RE: Last Call on draft-ietf-netlmm-proxymip6

2008-02-14 Thread Sri Gundavelli
Hi Ted, Thanks for the review. Please see inline. Regards Sri -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ted Hardie Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2008 5:01 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; ietf@ietf.org Subject: Re: Last Call on