.
--
Ted Faber
http://www.isi.edu/~faber PGP:
http://www.isi.edu/~faber/pubkeys.asc
Unexpected attachment on this mail? See
http://www.isi.edu/~faber/FAQ.html#SIG
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
(RFC 2119 terms, ALL CAPS vs lower case), IETFers have
some free time, too...
That's a service the IETF list provides. I hadn't noticed that it was
springtime until the seasonal discussion broke out.
--
Ted Faber
http://www.isi.edu/~faber PGP: http://www.isi.edu/~faber/pubkeys.asc
of _what has
already happened_ out in the world, not as an attempt to _make something
happen_.
What he said.
--
Ted Faber
http://www.isi.edu/~faber PGP: http://www.isi.edu/~faber/pubkeys.asc
Unexpected attachment on this mail? See http://www.isi.edu/~faber/FAQ.html#SIG
signature.asc
to
review a story before publication - let alone offer comments or
corrections - unless you have specifically negotiated that right with the
reporter and perhaps their superiors. YMMV. IANAL.
--
Ted Faber
http://www.isi.edu/~faber PGP: http://www.isi.edu/~faber/pubkeys.asc
Unexpected
don't care which one the community picks here. I've now asserted it
twice.
I don't care which one the community picks here. Now it's true.
--
Ted Faber
http://www.isi.edu/~faber PGP: http://www.isi.edu/~faber/pubkeys.asc
Unexpected attachment on this mail? See http://www.isi.edu
that search path collisions for short names are inherently
harder to avoid (and might rule out using the trailing dot notation in
applications to avoid them).
Is that basically what we disagree about?
--
Ted Faber
http://www.isi.edu/~faber PGP: http://www.isi.edu/~faber/pubkeys.asc
specifications allow such a thing.
But it was pretty cool. :-)
--
Ted Faber
http://www.isi.edu/~faber PGP: http://www.isi.edu/~faber/pubkeys.asc
Unexpected attachment on this mail? See http://www.isi.edu/~faber/FAQ.html#SIG
pgpDsbYVtxvai.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 02:17:57PM -0400, Keith Moore wrote:
Ted Faber wrote:
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 11:28:05PM -0400, Keith Moore wrote:
there are also protocol specifications that expect DNS names to have
dots in them.
One could argue that such protocols are not able to express all
small and speculative to me.
Time will tell.
--
Ted Faber
http://www.isi.edu/~faber PGP: http://www.isi.edu/~faber/pubkeys.asc
Unexpected attachment on this mail? See http://www.isi.edu/~faber/FAQ.html#SIG
pgpnFNUXS1fYz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
of these are not codified.
If there are only a few TLDs I really fail to see how this one fits
there and if there are a lot of TLDs I don't see how outlawing it helps
you. But YMMV and I'm not running a TLD server, so my opinion matters
little.
--
Ted Faber
http://www.isi.edu/~faber PGP
128.9.160.161
nameserver 128.9.64.64
--
Ted Faber
http://www.isi.edu/~faber PGP: http://www.isi.edu/~faber/pubkeys.asc
Unexpected attachment on this mail? See http://www.isi.edu/~faber/FAQ.html#SIG
pgpUQFJ0NE20m.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 01:38:28PM -0700, Ted Faber wrote:
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 01:32:10PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you can cite verifiable evidence that even a single case that works
reliably now, will cease to work, I'll concede that there is at least
a hint of merit to your
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 05:01:30PM -0400, Theodore Tso wrote:
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 01:38:28PM -0700, Ted Faber wrote:
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 01:32:10PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you can cite verifiable evidence that even a single case that works
reliably now, will cease
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 02:04:31PM -0700, Bill Manning wrote:
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 01:44:28PM -0700, Ted Faber wrote:
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 01:38:28PM -0700, Ted Faber wrote:
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 01:32:10PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
also...
% dig version.bind txt chaos
DNS name. I believe that was in dispute.
--
Ted Faber
http://www.isi.edu/~faber PGP: http://www.isi.edu/~faber/pubkeys.asc
Unexpected attachment on this mail? See http://www.isi.edu/~faber/FAQ.html#SIG
pgpJ2ZEDjEgl9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
, not
endorsing it.
--
Ted Faber
http://www.isi.edu/~faber PGP: http://www.isi.edu/~faber/pubkeys.asc
Unexpected attachment on this mail? See http://www.isi.edu/~faber/FAQ.html#SIG
pgpztwOP6Nr7P.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf
to use a lossless compression process.
Not that this is really on topic, but there are steganographic systems
that work just dandy on data encoded with lossy compression. Googling
steganography JPEG is a fine start. Audio's even better than pictures
- longer files.
--
Ted Faber
http://www.isi.edu
on kilter. I think your
arguments and your health could both stand a little perspective. That
may sound condescending, but the advice is well meant and freely given.
Take it or leave it, but I won't argue about it.
--
Ted Faber
http://www.isi.edu/~faber PGP: http://www.isi.edu/~faber
be a few words about it in the DCCP spec. It's UDP based.
--
Ted Faber
http://www.isi.edu/~faber PGP: http://www.isi.edu/~faber/pubkeys.asc
Unexpected attachment on this mail? See http://www.isi.edu/~faber/FAQ.html#SIG
pgpG0LOhQHDcQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 02:34:38PM -0700, Ted Faber wrote:
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 02:20:51PM -0700, william(at)elan.net wrote:
Tell us where 'retransmit', 'packet loss' and 'congestion' appear in DNS,
DHCP or some other UDP-based protocol documents and I'm sure author of
this spec
, not how many
browsers will render SVGs today, or whether the gimp or photoshop likes
them.
--
Ted Faber
http://www.isi.edu/~faber PGP: http://www.isi.edu/~faber/pubkeys.asc
Unexpected attachment on this mail? See http://www.isi.edu/~faber/FAQ.html#SIG
pgpH6qLYtOdzp.pgp
Description: PGP
with embedded text.
--
Ted Faber
http://www.isi.edu/~faber PGP: http://www.isi.edu/~faber/pubkeys.asc
Unexpected attachment on this mail? See http://www.isi.edu/~faber/FAQ.html#SIG
pgpiDlQ31VHDh.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Ietf mailing list
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 09:23:42AM +0200, Harald Alvestrand wrote:
Ted Faber wrote:
Multiplying or dividing is the worst thing you can do on a CPU in
general.
Note that CPUs are different; some multiply faster than others, compared
to the rest of the HW.
I am not a CPU designer, but my
divides per text to integer conversion and in strtoimax
(called by fscanf).
Multiplying or dividing is the worst thing you can do on a CPU in
general.
--
Ted Faber
http://www.isi.edu/~faber PGP: http://www.isi.edu/~faber/pubkeys.asc
Unexpected attachment on this mail? See http
has to
squeeze himself into such databases, he gives his first name as Mr.
I believe even he has the sense to have the name the Gov't thinks he
uses on his passport, etc., though I don't know.
--
Ted Faber
http://www.isi.edu/~faber PGP: http://www.isi.edu/~faber/pubkeys.asc
Unexpected
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 10:30:31AM -0800, Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:
The result is that 70% of wireless access points are open and can be
used by Internet criminals to achieve anonymous access.
Loaded statement? Check.
Precise statement? Check.
Supported statement? H.
--
Ted Faber
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 02:23:49PM -0500, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Ted Faber writes:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 10:30:31AM -0800, Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:
The result is that 70% of wireless access points are open and can be
used by Internet criminals
has
met that requirement.
Secure design is usually difficult in my experience, but I agree that
it's unfortunate that we didn't do better and haven't really done
better. But the situation really is bad enough without adding
half-naked pedophiles to the mix.
--
Ted Faber
http://www.isi.edu/~faber
.
(Again - I'm really not trying to run down xml2rfc. I think it's on the
right track and I support the idea and the work. I'm an enthusiastic
user.)
I am looking forward to the day when we not only agree about where to
go, but how to get there. :-)
--
Ted Faber
http://www.isi.edu/~faber
.
[snip]
the reason xml is interesting is that it makes editing easier, not just
display.
XML does not interest me for that reason.
--
Ted Faber
http://www.isi.edu/~faber PGP: http://www.isi.edu/~faber/pubkeys.asc
Unexpected attachment on this mail? See http://www.isi.edu/~faber
process and the quality of
standards (and other documents) that process produces, I'm all ears.
--
Ted Faber
http://www.isi.edu/~faber PGP: http://www.isi.edu/~faber/pubkeys.asc
Unexpected attachment on this mail? See http://www.isi.edu/~faber/FAQ.html#SIG
pgpBn1CrvoXWw.pgp
Description: PGP
On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 11:57:43AM -0800, Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:
From: Ted Faber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RFCs have authoritative versions for a couple reasons. Some
are the result of the IETF consensus process and the exact
wording on which consensus was achieved is important
projects on the Internet.
So apparently ASCII - rfc2xml is a public works project.
Your deleted comments about possible mistakes are all true, but also
at least mentioned by the folks at IMS.
--
Ted Faber
http://www.isi.edu/~faber PGP: http://www.isi.edu/~faber/pubkeys.asc
Unexpected
poorly reasoned. I'd prefer to make institutional
changes only when they're needed for the good of the institution, not to
prove that there's working process machinery.
--
Ted Faber
http://www.isi.edu/~faber PGP: http://www.isi.edu/~faber/pubkeys.asc
Unexpected attachment on this mail
.
Be advised, I consider the implication that I am a bureaucrat an insult.
--
Ted Faber
http://www.isi.edu/~faber PGP: http://www.isi.edu/~faber/pubkeys.asc
Unexpected attachment on this mail? See http://www.isi.edu/~faber/FAQ.html#SIG
pgpSZV9fvhq2G.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-template-v2.0-03.txt
--
Ted Faber
http://www.isi.edu/~faber PGP: http://www.isi.edu/~faber/pubkeys.asc
Unexpected attachment on this mail? See http://www.isi.edu/~faber/FAQ.html#SIG
pgpebt1thb0b5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Ietf mailing
On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 05:23:07PM -0600, Spencer Dawkins wrote:
Not replying to anyone in particular, but this thread does seem to be
cycling...
Yeah, with a period of about 6 months.
--
Ted Faber
http://www.isi.edu/~faber PGP: http://www.isi.edu/~faber/pubkeys.asc
Unexpected
On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 09:13:33AM +0100, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 09:22:10AM -0800, Ted Faber wrote:
Getting anyone to change their authoring tool is difficult, so hoping
for standardization on CVS input is pretty unlikely. In my experience,
IETF
On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 09:25:03AM +0100, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 09:45:00AM -0800, Ted Faber wrote:
WRT revision control software on I-Ds, I think it's an excellent idea,
but authors should use whatever they agree on. IMHO, the IETF doesn't
need to provide
into for the benefit. If the
Secretariat is going to provide something it may as well be wdiff
(ASCII/HTML) output which is human readable. IMHO.
--
Ted Faber
http://www.isi.edu/~faber PGP: http://www.isi.edu/~faber/pubkeys.asc
Unexpected attachment on this mail? See http://www.isi.edu/~faber
everyone's read Parry meets The Doctor? Nuff' said.
Probably not everyone gets Parry meets the Doctor
ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc439.txt
--
Ted Faber
http://www.isi.edu/~faber PGP: http://www.isi.edu/~faber/pubkeys.asc
Unexpected attachment on this mail? See http
/history/topics/topics_ji_bdy.html
Pass it on.
Now back to your regularly scheduled rant.
--
Ted Faber
http://www.isi.edu/~faber PGP: http://www.isi.edu/~faber/pubkeys.asc
Unexpected attachment on this mail? See http://www.isi.edu/~faber/FAQ.html#SIG
pgpyeTk4SSur2.pgp
Description: PGP
if somebody actually
did that. There was indeed a patent granted to two lawyers on a
method for writing patents, if you can believe it.
Stop it. You're scaring me.
--
Ted Faber
http://www.isi.edu/~faber PGP: http://www.isi.edu/~faber/pubkeys.asc
Unexpected attachment on this mail? See http
my
results for the list if there interest.
You don't fool me, Carl. Who's trying to invalidate your patent on
finding prior art to defend patents? :-)
--
Ted Faber
http://www.isi.edu/~faber PGP: http://www.isi.edu/~faber/pubkeys.asc
Unexpected attachment on this mail? See http
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 01:47:05PM +0100, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
The link is now up on the meeting page:
http://www.ietf.org/meetings/IETF-62.html
Excellent!
If I'd know it was that I'd have asked sooner.
Thanks!
--
Ted Faber
http://www.isi.edu/~faber PGP: http
Jabber at the IETF.
--
Ted Faber
http://www.isi.edu/~faber PGP: http://www.isi.edu/~faber/pubkeys.asc
Unexpected attachment on this mail? See http://www.isi.edu/~faber/FAQ.html#SIG
pgpCgoP902XRT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Ietf
the question, when communicating with the IETF one
shortens intellectual property to IPR. You can pretend it
abbrieviates Intellectual Property Rights or Intellectual PRoperty.
It replaces both phrases in discourse and writing.
--
Ted Faber
http://www.isi.edu/~faber PGP: http://www.isi.edu
47 matches
Mail list logo
