=20
Misha
Misha
Yes, spot on, thanks for that; I had read the IRI RFC and forgotten it. There
is a (Standards Track) precedent for specifying UCS in ABNF.
Tom Petch
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Tom.Petch
Sent: 05 January 2006
inline
Tom Petch
- Original Message -
From: Daniel Senie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Juergen Quittek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: IETF Discussion ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 4:10 PM
Subject: Re: ISMS working group and charter problems
At 09:14 AM 9/8/2005, Juergen Quittek wrote
and fund it themselves - wish I had.
Tom Petch
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
inline
Tom Petch
- Original Message -
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Hallam-Baker, Phillip [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: IETF General Discussion Mailing List ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2005 12:36 AM
Subject: Re: Port numbers andIPv6(was: I-D
ACTION:draft-klensin
Yes, I care; 'before my time' in IETF terms but something I would like to
understand better.
What size are you talking about?
Tom Petch
- Original Message -
From: Bob Braden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Monday, June 27, 2005 7:23 PM
Subject: History...?
I just came
inline
Tom Petch
- Original Message -
From: John C Klensin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Brian E Carpenter [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Keith Moore moore@cs.utk.edu
Cc: ietf@ietf.org; iesg@ietf.org; Dave Crocker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 11, 2005 6:07 AM
Subject: Re: Last Call: 'Email
and such like - it is non-technical skills that are needed to resolve the
situation; sometimes they are present in good quality, sometimes otherwise.
Tom Petch
- Original Message -
From: Thomas Narten [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Dave Crocker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Thursday, May 19
engineering skills, are less effective
at the role of chairmanship of meetings, a role which starts with the agenda,
ends with
the minutes, and involves making the most effective use of the 'face time' in
between.
Tom Petch
- Original Message -
From: Margaret Wasserman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Dave
, hunting a power drop with the
right holes, getting distracted by other cyberspace worlds, gets in the way.
In the larger sessions, I look around to see how many people have laptops; my
estimate is around 90%, ie around 10% do not.
Tom Petch
___
Ietf mailing
inline
Tom Petch
From: Kevin Loch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: nanog@merit.edu; ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2005 10:09 PM
Subject: Re: FW: Why?
As you know, the value of a network is roughly proportional to
the square of the participants.
The value of a network can depend on what
but no
information.
Tom Petch
Original Message -
From: Joel Jaeggli [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2005 6:04 PM
Subject: UPDATE - mp3 audio streaming...
The plenary should be available on channel-1 starting when it begins at
19:30 CST, 01:30 GMT. Most
and this technology will be viable
Tom Petch
- Original Message -
From: Jeroen Massar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Joel Jaeggli [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Monday, March 07, 2005 9:33 AM
Subject: Re: MP3 audio streaming for IETF 62
___
Ietf mailing list
inline
Tom Petch
- Original Message -
From: Larry Masinter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2005 1:55 AM
Subject: Re: Last Call: 'The telnet URI Scheme' to Proposed Standard
I think it would be much more useful if we could update the
document sufficiently
Revision 5 is ok with me.
Tom Petch
This is what I have in my edit buffer for revision 05
section title=Cost Center Accounting
anchor=cc-accounting
t
As discussed with ISOC, funds managed by IASA
shall
be accounted
Yes, still ok, I am still seeing those four words
Tom Petch
- Original Message -
From: Wijnen, Bert (Bert) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 1:34 PM
Subject: FW: Resolution? #787 terminology and issue 794 - naming of accounts
5.1 Cost Center
said we stay with (IASA) accounts and trust ISOC to produce
what is right.
Tom Petch
- Original Message -
From: Margaret Wasserman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Carl Malamud [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tom Petch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Harald Tveit Alvestrand [EMAIL PROTECTED]; ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Friday
every three months for some.
Tom Petch
Engineer (who is also his own accountant)
- Original Message -
From: Carl Malamud [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Margaret Wasserman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Harald Tveit Alvestrand [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tom Petch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Friday, January
Thanks for the clarification; I think your wording, the one without the
mention of the cost center,. is just fine.
Tom Petch
- Original Message -
From: Carl Malamud [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tom Petch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Margaret Wasserman [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Harald Tveit
Alvestrand [EMAIL
Inline,
Tom Petch
- Original Message -
From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2005 3:24 PM
Subject: Resolution? #787 terminology - in particular ISOC Standards
Pillar
In #787, Margaret raised a couple of terminology questions
,
publicly accessible mailing list, perhaps listed in the I-D
announcement, so that we can raise issues, hopefully resolve them,
before last call. Then a default yes could make sense.
Tom Petch
- Original Message -
From: Ted Hardie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Dave Crocker [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Harald
attached where the discussion can
happen.
Tom Petch
- Original Message -
From: Juergen Schoenwaelder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Vernon Schryver [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Monday, January 10, 2005 10:16 PM
Subject: Re: individual submission Last Call -- default yes/no.
On Mon, Jan
to be standards track.
I am in the 'default no' camp.
Tom Petch
- Original Message -
From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Dave Crocker [EMAIL PROTECTED]; ietf@ietf.org
Sent: Friday, January 07, 2005 10:46 AM
Subject: Re: individual submission Last Call -- default yes
spherical geometry will help clarify
this while the reference to equivalence classes I find mistaken, since
there are discussions on not letting packets through as part of spam
control:-)
Tom Petch
-Original Message-
From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tom Petch [EMAIL
inline
Tom Petch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One reason why spam works is that it is so cheap to send 1M messages
that even if 99.99% fail to reach a destination, the operation is still
a success. If sending 1M messages got back a 1% response saying 'you
failed' with no clue as to which 1
origin.
One reason why spam works is that it is so cheap to send 1M messages that
even if 99.99% fail to reach a destination, the operation is still a
success. If sending 1M messages got back a 1% response saying 'you
failed' with no clue as to which 1% failed, we might cut down on the spam.
Tom
.
Reading your definition, I cannot tell where you stand; are firewalls and
networks behind them included in IETF mission or not?
Tom Petch
-Original Message-
From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 11 February 2004 01:59
Subject: Continuing
to get a screenshot as a counter-counter measure is a good one - the
images, at least, must be downloaded as far as the screen :-)
Tom Petch
-Original Message-
From: Parry Aftab [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Tom Petch' [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Mark Smith'
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL
Banks do make it extraordinarily easy for their sites to be spoofed by
allowing all their html, .gif etc to appear in my Temporary Internet Folder
without even me having to lift a finger.
You can make web sites which don't download - time for banks to learn about
this.
Tom Petch, Consultant
Is that 11xx as in local group address or xx00 as in universal
unicast?
Tom Petch
-Original Message-
From: Adam Roach [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Theodore Ts'o' [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Brett Thorson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL
could
be a factor in this).
So why leave the company office? You are probably most productive
sitting there in comfort.
Tom Petch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
of this thread.
Tom Petch, Network Consultant
forwarding), the general purpose applications from
the specialised packet processing. But it will allow
multiple BGP engines and multiple packet processing engines
to interconnect to form a logical whole.
But don't hold your breath; the RFC are a year away.
Tom Petch, Network Consultant
[EMAIL
32 matches
Mail list logo
