Re: Internet SYN Flooding, spoofing attacks

2000-02-15 Thread Vernon Schryver
cally easy to make bad traffic that cannot be filtered (press releases from security outfits notwithstanding). Vernon Schryver[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: IETF Adelaide and interim meetings for APPS WGs

2000-02-14 Thread Vernon Schryver
. I can't find words in RFC 2418 that say that the mailing list is the authoritative forum, which strikes me as a terrible omission or catastrophic de facto change.) Vernon Schryver[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: IETF Adelaide and interim meetings for APPS WGs

2000-02-14 Thread Vernon Schryver
in email, none that I can recall. (I hope they'll they'll take that as a compliment on their social skills instead of an affront to their national pride.) Vernon Schryver[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Last Call: Registry Registrar Protocol (RRP) Version 1.1.0 to Informational

2000-01-05 Thread Vernon Schryver
some ISP's into trouble and the lack of censoring that has protected others. Vernon Schryver[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Email messages: How large is too large?

1999-12-17 Thread Vernon Schryver
son for having such a protocol. The reason for it now seems to be to hide the unhidable differences between big and small files and between internal and external file transfers. Vernon Schryver[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Email messages: How large is too large?

1999-12-17 Thread Vernon Schryver
ntended to mean, since it clearly cannot be the notion used in RFC 821 or RFC 822. My guess is that it means something about the final SMTP server.) See also RFC 1870. Vernon Schryver[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<    1   2   3   4