On Sep 5, 2013 5:17 PM, Dean Willis dean.wil...@softarmor.com wrote:
This is bigger than the perpass list.
I suggested that the surveillance/broken crypto challenge represents
damage to the Internet. I'm not the only one thinking that way.
I'd like to share the challenge raised by Bruce
On Jun 1, 2013 11:52 AM, John C Klensin john-i...@jck.com wrote:
Brian,
I really need to stop posting to this thread -- I have other
things to do and I don't believe the conversation is leading to
anything actionable. Second-guessing is fairly useless at this
point and there are at least a
On May 27, 2013 10:56 AM, Henning Schulzrinne h...@cs.columbia.edu wrote:
Agreed - this is not so much about standards, but developer awareness. If
we write any how to or similar informational documents, they should
probably contain that type of discussion.
There is a browser aspect, however:
On May 10, 2013 11:51 AM, SM s...@resistor.net wrote:
At 16:06 16-04-2013, The IESG wrote:
The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider
the following document:
- 'The Internet Numbers Registry System'
draft-housley-rfc2050bis-01.txt as Informational RFC
The
