> "David" == David Harrington writes:
David> The IETF could mandate a specific protocol to try to ensure
David> interoperability, but doing this takes the decision out of the
David> responsibility of the deployer to choose the best solution for the
David> deployment environmen
On 7/19/12 9:02 AM, "Sam Hartman" wrote:
>I think that behave-lsn-requirements is far more useful if it names a
>specific protocol by name. By endorcing one of our middlebox protocols,
>we encourage interoperability. If we don't pick a protocol by name, we
>don't really promote interoperabilit
Le 2012-07-19 14:20, David Harrington a écrit :
The IETF could mandate a specific protocol to try to ensure
interoperability, but doing this takes the decision out of the
responsibility of the deployer to choose the best solution for the
deployment environment, and out of the responsibility of th
