--On Saturday, June 01, 2013 11:28 -0400 Warren Kumari
war...@kumari.net wrote:
...
I *really* want to make sure that my CEO always gets the same
address, and want him to be assigned specific DNS servers and
use a certain gateway. The folk who manage the DHCP are the
Internal Services
On Jun 2, 2013, at 10:15 AM, John C Klensin john-i...@jck.com wrote:
--On Saturday, June 01, 2013 11:28 -0400 Warren Kumari war...@kumari.net
wrote:
...
It turns out that as soon as you envisage a network in which
some nodes only support 32 bit addresses and other nodes
can't get a globally
On Jun 1, 2013, at 12:35 AM, Brian E Carpenter brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 01/06/2013 15:00, John C Klensin wrote:
--On Friday, May 31, 2013 17:23 -0700 Randy Bush ra...@psg.com
wrote:
rant
the sad fact is that the ietf culture is often not very good at
listening to the
On May 31, 2013, at 8:23 PM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
rant
the sad fact is that the ietf culture is often not very good at
listening to the (ops) customer. look at the cf we have made out of
ipv6. the end user, and the op, want the absolute minimal change and
cost, let me get
Warren Kumari wrote:
Unfortunately the was a bad case of creeping featuritis and we got:
A new, and unfortunately very complex way of resolving L2 addresses.
You may use ARP (and DHCP) with IPv6.
Extension headers that make it so you cannot actually forward
packets in modern hardware
(
