Re: [IETF] Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-intarea-ipv4-id-update-05.txt (Updated Specification of the IPv4 ID Field) to Proposed Standard

2012-06-05 Thread Joe Touch
Kuari wrote: On Jun 3, 2012, at 12:34 AM, C. M. Heard wrote: On Sat, 2 Jun 2012, Masataka Ohta wrote: Existing routers, which was relying on ID uniqueness of atomic packets, are now broken when they fragment the atomic packets. Such routers were always broken. An atomic packet has DF=0 and

Re: [IETF] Re: Last Call: draft-ietf-intarea-ipv4-id-update-05.txt (Updated Specification of the IPv4 ID Field) to Proposed Standard

2012-06-03 Thread Warren Kumari
-- No man is an island, But if you take a bunch of dead guys and tie them together, they make a pretty good raft. --Anon. On Jun 3, 2012, at 12:34 AM, C. M. Heard wrote: On Sat, 2 Jun 2012, Masataka Ohta wrote: Existing routers, which was relying on ID uniqueness of atomic