I've read the I-D and EKR's responses, and while I don't agree with all of them
I agree with enough of them that I think that the draft could use a further
revision that takes them into consideration.
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 04:29:24PM -0700, Paul Leach wrote:
I've read the I-D and EKR's responses, and while I don't agree with all of
them I agree with enough of them that I think that the draft could use a
further revision that takes them into consideration.
Would someone send a pointer
Alexey Melnikov said:
This statement taken in isolation is certainly correct. However if the
original LC didn't ask the right question, don't you think this makes
answers meaningless?
The reviews are not meaningless. They represent the feedback of the IETF
community. Rather than asking a
Hi Bernard,
Bernard Aboba wrote:
Alexey Melnikov said:
This statement taken in isolation is certainly correct. However if the
original LC didn't ask the right question, don't you think this makes
answers meaningless?
The reviews are not meaningless.
I didn't say that reviews were
On Saturday, September 08, 2007 01:53:36 PM -0700 Eric Rescorla
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alexey wrote:
This message is trying to summarize recent discussions on
draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt.
Several people voiced their support for the document (on IETF mailing
list and in various
Eric Rescorla wrote:
Alexey wrote:
This message is trying to summarize recent discussions on
draft-hartman-webauth-phishing-05.txt.
Several people voiced their support for the document (on IETF mailing
list and in various other off-list discussions). Ekr doesn't think that
the document
