...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] Update on Orlando time for human language draft
discussion
Sorry for barging in late on this thread, but quick questions:
- what's the right mailing list to post to on this one?
- have everyone read RFC 3282 (the standalone accept-language spec)?
Seems to me
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] Update on Orlando time for human language draft
discussion
Sorry for barging in late on this thread, but quick questions:
- what's the right mailing list to post to on this one?
- have everyone read RFC 3282 (the standalone accept-language spec)?
Seems to me
...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [MMUSIC] Update on Orlando time for human language draft
discussion
Sorry for barging in late on this thread, but quick questions:
- what's the right mailing list to post to on this one?
- have everyone read RFC 3282 (the standalone accept-language spec)?
Seems to me
] Update on Orlando time for human language draft
discussion
Sorry for barging in late on this thread, but quick questions:
- what's the right mailing list to post to on this one?
- have everyone read RFC 3282 (the standalone accept-language spec)?
Seems to me the desired semantic is more
Sorry for barging in late on this thread, but quick questions:
- what's the right mailing list to post to on this one?
- have everyone read RFC 3282 (the standalone accept-language spec)?
Seems to me the desired semantic is more accept-language than
content-language.
On 03/10/2013 03:38 PM,
