On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 12:34 PM, Douglas Otis wrote:
>
> When the REPUTE list first started, I commented about DKIM's inability to
> support fair reputation, and about 1 year ago, and then again a few months
> ago IIRC. These comments were ignored with some denouncement appearing in
> other venu
On Aug 30, 2013, at 7:50 PM, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> Colleagues, and Doug especially,
>
> The message I sent (below) wasn't intended as a "shut up and go away"
> message, but a genuine query. I have grave doubts that TLS is the
> right example (to begin with, I think fitting it into the REPUT
Colleagues, and Doug especially,
The message I sent (below) wasn't intended as a "shut up and go away"
message, but a genuine query. I have grave doubts that TLS is the
right example (to begin with, I think fitting it into the REPUTE
approach, given the existing CA structure, would also be
contro
