2013 06:24
À : Robert Sparks; BOUCADAIR Mohamed OLNC/OLN
Cc : dh...@ietf.org; General Area Review Team; ietf@ietf.org; draft-ietf-
dhc-triggered-reconfig...@tools.ietf.org
Objet : RE: [dhcwg] RE : Gen-art review: draft-ietf-dhc-triggered-
reconfigure-05
Robert:
The reason to allow
-art review:
draft-ietf-dhc-triggered-reconfigure-05
On 4/26/13 10:58 AM, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote:
Dear Robert,
Thank you for the review.
Please see inline.
Cheers,
Med
De : dhcwg-boun...@ietf.org [dhcwg-boun...@ietf.org] de la part de
; BOUCADAIR Mohamed OLNC/OLN
Cc : dh...@ietf.org; General Area Review Team; ietf@ietf.org; draft-ietf-
dhc-triggered-reconfig...@tools.ietf.org
Objet : RE: [dhcwg] RE : Gen-art review: draft-ietf-dhc-triggered-
reconfigure-05
Robert:
The reason to allow this is that otherwise client
-triggered-reconfig...@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] RE : Gen-art review:
draft-ietf-dhc-triggered-reconfigure-05
On 4/29/13 12:59 AM, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote:
Robert,
Ted suggested a wording which is better than the one I proposed. I made the
following changes my local copy:
(1
On Apr 29, 2013, at 10:18 AM, Bernie Volz (volz) v...@cisco.com wrote:
But I don't really see this as a big issue and the must is the lower-case
variant anyway.
There's a big debate about whether this makes any difference. It's generally
thought to be better not to say must if you don't
