This isn't really a serious resolution.
It smacks exactly of the Army's response to the red cross over abuse at
Abu Graib. For months, the Army has said it responded promptly to the Red
Cross' written complaints. Today, in the NY Times, it was revealed what
the response was: Tell us when you
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dean Anderson) writes:
... For the less technical, an exchange point is ...
I don't think there's anyone on this list less technical than you, Dean.
--
Paul Vixie
___
Ietf mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 01:35 18/05/04, Paul Vixie wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dean Anderson) writes:
... For the less technical, an exchange point is ...
I don't think there's anyone on this list less technical than you, Dean.
Thank you :-)
jfc
___
Ietf mailing list
[EMAIL
Sigh.
Harald, Please add __Another__ complaint to the chair about inappropriate
behavior by Mr. Vixie.
Oh wait, could it be that lying to the general public saying our address
space is hijacked is a personal attack? Hmm. Maybe they aren't as
'perfessional' as they made out to be. Maybe these
Mr. Anderson,
I note that your use of the terms infantile, irresponsible and
immature are personal attacks. These are inappropriate for the IETF list.
If you have serious complaints to make that you feel require you to use
these terms, send them to me privately.
If you want to send mail to the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2004-05-11, at 23.55, Dean Anderson wrote:
On Tue, 11 May 2004, Joe Abley wrote:
For the benefit of less-operational people here who don't see humour
in
this, 198.32.176.0/24 is the PAIX IPv4 peering fabric in the Bay Area.
This block is
On Mon, 17 May 2004, Kurt Erik Lindqvist wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2004-05-11, at 23.55, Dean Anderson wrote:
On Tue, 11 May 2004, Joe Abley wrote:
For the benefit of less-operational people here who don't see humour
in this, 198.32.176.0/24 is the
]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [dnsop] Re: Complaint on abuse of DNSOP lists
On Mon, 10 May 2004, John Stracke wrote:
Dean Anderson wrote:
It seems that WG co-chair has begun to use an
email address that is
defaming Av8 Internet, Inc
How is it defamation if the only one that gets
but ISC.ORG doesn't want to take a complaint. Bill Manning, of EP.NET
(ISC.ORG upstream) says he has no contract with me to accept complaints
about ISC.ORG.
--Dean
Dean... you are asserting a relationship that you have no
way to prove exists. Unless or until
assignment of IP space does not impune any other
service. Asserting otherwise is foolish. Pressing
the point, esp. in public fora, appears to be
willful ignorance. Please enjoy your blissful state.
--bill
On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 02:02:45PM -0400, Dean
DNSOP list members -
A friendly reminder about the list setup:
DNSOP, the Domain Name System Operations WG list.
Questions about the administration of this list should be addressed to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posts intended for the entire list should be addressed to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you plan to
if you are serious, please feel free to contact your legal council
to persue remedies.
On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 03:32:27PM -0400, Dean Anderson wrote:
I can't parse your statement. I didn't say assignment of IP space
__impunes__ a service. Perhaps you meant to say that your assignment of
On 11 May 2004, at 14:02, Dean Anderson wrote:
The following message indicates that EP.NET has assigned an IP address
to
ISC.ORG. You are quite well aware of this. Dissembling will not help
you.
For the benefit of less-operational people here who don't see humour in
this, 198.32.176.0/24 is
I would ignore this, but it materially mis-states ISC.ORGS involvement in
SORBS. ISC.ORG __HOSTS__ www.sorbs.net on 204.152.186.189:
On Tue, 11 May 2004, Joe Abley wrote:
For the benefit of less-operational people here who don't see humour in
this, 198.32.176.0/24 is the PAIX IPv4 peering
On 11 May 2004, at 17:55, Dean Anderson wrote:
I would ignore this, but it materially mis-states ISC.ORGS involvement
in
SORBS. ISC.ORG __HOSTS__ www.sorbs.net on 204.152.186.189:
For a more complete list of resources hosted at ISC, you might try:
http://www.isc.org/ops/hosting
On Tue, 11
--Barr Hibbs
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf
Of Dean Anderson
Sent: Monday, 10 May 2004 13:24
To: John Stracke
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [dnsop] Re: Complaint on abuse of DNSOP lists
On Mon, 10
--On 11. mai 2004 17:10 -0400 Joe Abley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For the benefit of less-operational people here who don't see humour in
this, 198.32.176.0/24 is the PAIX IPv4 peering fabric in the Bay Area.
Some of Dean's mail servers are listed on SORBS. ISC's MXes use SORBS.
Perhaps we
The following message indicates that EP.NET has assigned an IP address to
ISC.ORG. You are quite well aware of this. Dissembling will not help
you.
--Dean
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 10:26:42 -0500 (EST)
From: Dean Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: bill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
I can't parse your statement. I didn't say assignment of IP space
__impunes__ a service. Perhaps you meant to say that your assignment of
IP address space to abusers doesn't impune the rest of your services. This
was the claim made by Media3 in Media3 v. MAPS. Media3 lost.
But assignment of IP
19 matches
Mail list logo
