--On Monday, August 13, 2012 22:26 -0400 Eric Burger
wrote:
> +1. The ITU is not evil. It just is not the right place for
> Internet standards development. As John points out, there are
> potential uses of the ITU-T for good.
Eric,
I'd narrow your first statement further and say "Internet
tec
- Original Message -
From: "ALAIN AINA"
To: "IETF"
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2012 1:21 PM
I will say "there are potential uses of the ITU for good".
Yes, they did a brilliant job in developing standards which allow
the proprietary phone network of one country to interface to
the propr
I will say "there are potential uses of the ITU for good".
--Alain
On Aug 14, 2012, at 6:26 AM, Eric Burger wrote:
> +1. The ITU is not evil. It just is not the right place for Internet
> standards development. As John points out, there are potential uses of the
> ITU-T for good.
>
> On Aug
+1. The ITU is not evil. It just is not the right place for Internet standards
development. As John points out, there are potential uses of the ITU-T for good.
On Aug 13, 2012, at 10:50 AM, John C Klensin wrote:
>
>
> --On Monday, August 13, 2012 11:11 +0200 Alessandro Vesely
> wrote:
>
>> .
--On Monday, August 13, 2012 11:11 +0200 Alessandro Vesely
wrote:
>...
> FWIW, I'd like to recall that several governments endorse IETF
> protocols by establishing Internet based procedures for
> official communications with the relevant PA, possibly giving
> them legal standing. Francesco Gen
On Mon 13/Aug/2012 03:22:52 +0200 JFC Morfin wrote:
> At 19:16 11/08/2012, John C Klensin wrote:
>
>> On the other hand, irrational behavior would be nothing new in this
>> area so I can't disagree with the possibility.
>
> Correct. This is why, if I understand the motivation, I strongly
> disagr
