> "Simon" == Simon Perreault writes:
Simon> MUST NOT permit the lifetime of a mapping to be reduced beyond its
Simon> current life or be set to zero (deleted)
OK.
>> and MUST NOT support the third-party option.
Simon> I think pcp-base-26 added restrictions to THIRD_PARTY
>> Then that still permits the case of third_party for administration
>> motivating the text in 13.1.
>
> Makes sense to me.
+1
> How about adding a sentence like...
>
> "CGN as described in this document does not provide any security
> benefits over either single-user NAT or no NAT at all."
I
On 07/10/2012 04:03 PM, Sam Hartman wrote:
>> and MUST NOT support the third-party option.
Simon> I think pcp-base-26 added restrictions to THIRD_PARTY so that it
could
Simon> be used in CGN scenarios. If that is right, wouldn't it then make
Simon> sense to allow THIRD_PARTY
