At first I thought that it might be good to leave section 4.1,
but now I changed my mind. I think the order of the preference
might depend on the running environment: some people prefer
secured one, some people prefer DNS... So I'd like to make
the order
t == t p daedu...@btconnect.com writes:
t Just to make public what I have hinted at privately, I think that steps
t in section 4.1 may be somewhat underspecified.
t A related issue is that section 4.1 prefers DNS to DHCP for Kerberos
t information but the Security Considerations
;
sec...@ietf.org; ietf@ietf.org; jh...@cmu.edu
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2012 6:50 PM
Subject: Re: [secdir] secdir review of
draft-sakane-dhc-dhcpv6-kdc-option
- Original Message -
From: Jeffrey Hutzelman jh...@cmu.edu
To: Samuel Weiler weiler+sec...@watson.org
Cc: draft-sakane-dhc-dhcpv6-kdc-opt...@tools.ietf.org;
sec...@ietf.org; ietf@ietf.org; jh...@cmu.edu
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2012 6:50 PM
Subject: Re: [secdir] secdir review of
draft-sakane
, 2012 6:50 PM
Subject: Re: [secdir] secdir review of
draft-sakane-dhc-dhcpv6-kdc-option
-
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2012.0.2178 / Virus Database: 2433/5055 - Release Date: 06/07/12
of
draft-sakane-dhc-dhcpv6-kdc-option
On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 19:12 -0400, Samuel Weiler wrote:
With that said, there are some things that need clarification, and the
doc sorely needs an editorial pass. As-is, the doc is not ready for
publication. I will be happy to review the doc again once it's been
thoroughly edited.
It
