RE: A question regarding IETF appointments

2005-09-21 Thread Yaakov Stein
In addition, BCP 10 (RFC 3777) in no way limits the NomCom from selecting sitting ISOC Board members to be on the IAB or IESG. I think it would be best to avoid having ADs on the BoT, as they are overworked already, and (should be) focused on producing the protocols we need now. However,

Re: A question regarding IETF appointments

2005-09-21 Thread Thomas Narten
There is a new relationship between ISOC and the IETF for administrative support as defined by BCP 101 (RFC 4071). Given these changes in our ties to ISOC, the IAB has been discussing (without coming to any conclusion on the matter) whether it is any longer appropriate for someone to

RE: A question regarding IETF appointments

2005-09-21 Thread sbrim
Leslie allegedly wrote: Annually, the IAB makes an appointment to one of three seats on the Internet Society Board of Trustees (ISOC BoT). BCP 77 (RFC 3677), which describes the selection process, allows IESG and IAB members to be selected for the ISOC Board, though no more than two of the

A question regarding IETF appointments

2005-09-20 Thread Leslie Daigle
Annually, the IAB makes an appointment to one of three seats on the Internet Society Board of Trustees (ISOC BoT). BCP 77 (RFC 3677), which describes the selection process, allows IESG and IAB members to be selected for the ISOC Board, though no more than two of the three could be IESG or IAB